Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
sem at FreeBSD.org
Thu Dec 15 14:44:40 UTC 2011
15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет:
> On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel:
>>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS.
>>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used.
>> Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with
>> journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more similar
>> in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use
>> with FreeBSD?
> I was running some ZFS vs. UFS tests as well and this happened to have
> ZFS on when I was running some other tests.
Can we look at the tests?
My opinion is ZFS without tuning is much slower than UFS2.
More information about the freebsd-stable