rpcbind, rpc.statd memory footprint

[Erik Trulsson]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> I'm not sure what to expect from these (i.e. what is "normal" in this
> case?) but the VM sizes for the NFS-used rpc.statd and rpcbind here look
> a bit too big, compared to their resident sizes:
> 
>   778 root             1  44    0 26420K  3256K select  1   0:01  0.00%
> rpcbind
>   891 root             1  44    0   263M  1296K select  1   0:01  0.00%
> rpc.statd
> 
> This is 8-stable amd64. Could there be a memory leak somewhere,
> especially in rpc.statd?

FAQ:  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#STATD-MEM-LEAK

(Short version: That is expected behaviour from rpc.statd)

-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013 at student.uu.se