zfs send/receive: is this slow?
Brandon Gooch
jamesbrandongooch at gmail.com
Sat Oct 2 02:58:47 UTC 2010
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Artem Belevich <fbsdlist at src.cx> wrote:
>> As soon as I opened this email I knew what it would say.
>>
>>
>> # time zfs send storage/bacula at transfer | mbuffer | zfs receive
>> storage/compressed/bacula-mbuffer
>> in @ 197 MB/s, out @ 205 MB/s, 1749 MB total, buffer 0% full
> ...
>> Big difference. :)
>
> I'm glad it helped.
>
> Does anyone know why sending/receiving stuff via loopback is so much
> slower compared to pipe?
This may shed some light on that topic:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-September/019877.html
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list