hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed

[Pawel Jakub Dawidek]

On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:57:08PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:06:49 +0200 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> 
>  MG> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:01:00 +0100 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> 
>  PJD>> I like your patch and I agree of course it is better to send keepalive
>  PJD>> packets only when connection is idle. The only thing I'd change is to
>  PJD>> modify QUEUE_TAKE1() macro to take additional argument 'timeout' - if we
>  PJD>> don't want it to time out, we pass 0. Could you modify your patch?
> 
>  MG> Sure :-). Could you look at the updated version?
> 
>  MG> Note. So far I have only tested that hastd with this updated patch is
>  MG> compilable and runnable. I will do normal testing today later when I have
>  MG> access to my test instances and will report about the results.
> 
> Tested. It works for me.

Great. Committed, thanks!

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheelsystems.com
pjd at FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20101102/e54a9f5d/attachment.pgp