loader(8) readin failed on 7.2R and later including 8.0R
John Baldwin
john at baldwin.cx
Thu Mar 18 14:46:14 UTC 2010
On Thursday 18 March 2010 7:10:59 am Carsten Bäcker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i ran into a similar problem when recently trying to install 8.0R on an
> embedded system. We've been using this hardware for a couple of
> years with FreeBSD 4.11 and didn't see any problem like this.
>
> Disabling the memory hole (15-16M) solved the problem here, but
> that shouldn't be a solution. I wonder whether it's a loader-, or a
> BIOS-problem, since memory-allocation should respect reserved
> areas.
The problem is likely because an 8.0 kernel is simply larger than a 4.11
kernel. 4.11's loader would have had the same issue. The problem (as it
were), is that we expect to be able to load the kernel + modules into one
contiguous chunk of RAM, starting at 4MB (PAE and amd64 kernels start at
2MB).
> Best regards
> Carsten Bäcker
>
>
> On Sunday 06 December 2009 12:16:36 am Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > Hiroki Sato<h... at freebsd.org> wrote
> > in<20091205.184250.201700943.... at allbsd.org>:
> >
> > hr> A summary so far is:
> > hr>
> > hr> 1) a<8MB 7.1R kernel + stock 8.0R loader
> > hr> 2a) a>8MB 8.0R kernel + stock 8.0R loader
> > hr> 2b) a>8MB 8.0R kernel + 8.0R loader with LOADER_NO_GPT_SUPPORT=yes
> > hr> 2c) a>8MB 8.0R kernel + loader with your patch
> > hr> 3a) a<8MB 8.0R kernel + stock 8.0R loader
> > hr> 3b) a<8MB 8.0R kernel + 8.0R loader with LOADER_NO_GPT_SUPPORT=yes
> > hr> 3c) a<8MB 8.0R kernel + loader with your patch
> >
> > Grr, I double-checked how it got stuck, then I found the console
> > redirect was disabled because of an old device.hints. The revised
> > summary is:
> >
> > loading text loading syms boot
> > 1) OK OK OK
> > 2a) "readin failed" - -
> > 2b) OK "skipped!" OK
> > 2c) OK "skipped!" OK
> > 3a) OK OK OK
> > 3b) OK OK OK
> > 3c) OK OK OK
> >
> > So, the case 2c shows that your patch solves the problem in the case
> > 2a. Thank you! :)
> >
> > Loading>8MB kernel works now, but loading syms sections still fails
> > even in the case 2c.
>
> Ok. Your system's SMAP is kind of weird (it has a very small region above
> 1MB, so it may not deal well with "large" kernels, though I thought it had
> enough room for at least a 12MB kernel. Hmm, the size of the kernel file may
> be deceptive though since it does not include BSS. I wonder if it is trying
> to load the symbols after the BSS.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list