samba recplacement

Nenhum_de_Nos matheus at eternamente.info
Sun Feb 7 03:34:36 UTC 2010


On Sun, February 7, 2010 01:02, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, February 7, 2010 00:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, February 6, 2010 23:44, Eric wrote:
>>>>> On 2/5/2010 9:22 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>>>>>> hail,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've installed a recent 8-stable with gnome installed. I needed
>>>>>> samba
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> noticed I have samba4-devel installed. but I can't manage to make it
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> simple file server as I need. so how to change samba package at
>>>>>> minimum
>>>>>> harm ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> do I need to reinstall all ? a simple make fetch in samba33 says I
>>>>>> can't
>>>>>> as it conflicts with samba4 and some tbd-something (not in the
>>>>>> machine
>>>>>> right now).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is there easy way ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd really like to choose samba version ... I've found a thread in
>>>>>> gnome@
>>>>>> about this change (from late december). not a solution though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> matheus
>>>>>
>>>>> pretty sure samba 4 is not stable yet. i played with it and it didnt
>>>>> work too well a few months ago. go back to the 3.x branch. thats easy
>>>>> to
>>>>> config.
>>>>
>>>> I think this way too, the problem is how to do it in the least painful
>>>> way. if I deinstall all samba stuff, gnome will fail to work ?
>>>>
>>>> matheus
>>>
>>> This is what I did:
>>>
>>> go to /usr/ports/x11/gnome2; do "make config"; deselect the MAPI
>>> option.
>>
>> what I will loose in functionality ?
>
> I don't know.  Some functions related to the mail client "evolution."

if just evolution is affected, no problem for me.

>> I'd have to rebuild it all, right ?
>
> I think if you just delete samba4-devel and its dependencies, then you
> can rebuild from there.

yeah ... I'll need to rebuild ...

but I need samba3 for filesharing purposes :)

thanks,

maheus

-- 
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list