ionice in FreeBSD?
kabaev at gmail.com
Fri Feb 5 17:57:04 UTC 2010
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:25:55 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd at jdc.parodius.com> wrote:
> I appreciate your work on this -- truly I do -- but the above
> statement is incredible. This is not meant as a flame-inducer, but
> there's really no other way to phrase it:
> This IS NOT what "production-ready" means to the rest of us,
> particularly those of us in the server world. A single developer
> running such code on their workstation for a few months is in no way
> identical to that of a heavily I/O-bound server.
> I thought freebsd.org (or maybe ISC?) offered some test/development
> boxes on the 'net available to developers who could test such code +
> perform stress tests over long periods of time? I'm probably
> mistaken, but I was under that impression.
> i would say it is pretty solid. I used it on my main workstation
> and desktop for a few months last year without a glitch.
In what twilight zone does that mean 'Yes, it is production ready' to
warrant such a nice diatribe?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20100205/b63b8e94/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-stable