recent 8.2-STABLE commits break nullfs for tinderbox?

Matthias Andree mandree at FreeBSD.org
Wed Dec 22 14:13:51 UTC 2010


Am 22.12.2010 14:29, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Am 22.12.2010 13:44, schrieb Mike Tancsa:
>> > On 12/22/2010 7:03 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> >> Greetings,
>> >> 
>> >> I'm tracking 8.2-PRERELEASE, and it appears that recent commits to nullfs, zfs,
>> >> vfs, or thereabouts have broken Tinderbox for me.
>> >> 
>> >> I'm mounting my ports tree via nullfs, which has been working fine for a year.
>> >> 
>> >> Any ideas, or further info needed?
>> > 
>> > Hi,
>> > 	Whats specifically broken ?  Two of the freebsd tinderbox machines are
>> > RELENG_8 from Dec 3 and they are fine.  However, they dont use nullfs,
>> > just zfs and ufs.  Is it just nullfs thats broken ? What are the errors
>> > you are getting ?
>> 
>> I updated after that.
>> 
>> mount_nullfs /usr/ports.cvs /usr/local/tinderbox/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports fails
>> with "resource conflict avoided".  I'll now rebuild GENERIC from scratch
>> (including "make clean") to see if that helps.
>> 
>> Tried switching to NFS, this appears to work now.
> 
> FWIW, i can't find this error message ("resource conflict avoided")
> anywhere in /usr/src, /usr/include, nor /usr/ports on RELENG_8 source
> dated from 2 hours ago.
> 
> grep -ri "resource conflict" /usr/src does return some results, but
> nothing that looks identical to the string you posted.

Sorry, my fault, was quoting from memory.

This is now pasted:
mount_nullfs: Resource deadlock avoided

> Only reason I'm pointing this out: it would be good to find the commit
> that breaks things for you, if there is such a commit, but we need
> something to key off of.

Provided above.  Tests of "kernel rebuilt from scratch" are pending (requires
reboot and reconfiguration for nullfs).


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list