aesni(?) corrupts data on 8.2-BETA1

[Mike Tancsa]

On 12/12/2010 3:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 07:37:51PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> On 12/11/2010 6:22 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> *date=2010.12.02.23.00.00
>>
>> which is a day before
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-8/2010-December/004338.html
>>
>>
>> And that seems to fix it!
>>
>> I  have been running
>> cryptotest -c -z -t 10
>> in a loop for the past 10min and not one error.
> 
> Please try this patch on the latest HEAD or RELENG_8.
> 

I tried both on i386 and amd64 and all looks good!  I did 1000
iterations of
cryptotest -c -z -t 10

without issue!  Thanks for the quick fix!

	---Mike

0(backup3)# patch -p1 < p
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/sys/amd64/amd64/fpu.c b/sys/amd64/amd64/fpu.c
|index 482b5da..1b493b4 100644
|--- a/sys/amd64/amd64/fpu.c
|+++ b/sys/amd64/amd64/fpu.c
--------------------------
Patching file sys/amd64/amd64/fpu.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 426.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/sys/i386/isa/npx.c b/sys/i386/isa/npx.c
|index 9ec5d25..f314e44 100644
|--- a/sys/i386/isa/npx.c
|+++ b/sys/i386/isa/npx.c
--------------------------
Patching file sys/i386/isa/npx.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 684.
done
0(backup3)#