constant zfs data corruption
koitsu at FreeBSD.org
Mon Oct 20 10:19:29 PDT 2008
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:03:14AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Hm... I thought we determined earlier in this thread that the OP is
>> getting the benefits of ZFS checksums because he's not using raidz
>> a single disk with a single pool)?
> He's not getting working filesystem redundancy with the existing config
> and is vulnerable to losing data from a single drive failure, agreed.
> But the ZFS checksum mechanism should still be working to detect data
> corruption, even though ZFS cannot recover the corrupted data the way it
> otherwise would if redundancy was available.
Ahh, I see. So to paraphrase, ZFS can detect checksum errors (data
corruption) using any pool type (single disk, mirror, raidz, whatever),
but can only *repair* the error when using a mirror or raidz.
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
More information about the freebsd-stable