CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with
cliftonr at lava.net
Sun Jun 8 01:32:51 UTC 2008
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:53:10PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> The question I raised is simply: given the number of bugs opened and
> fixed since 6.3-RELEASE shipped, why is 6.3 the only supported
> version? Why does it make sense for FreeBSD to stop supporting a
> stable version and force people to choose between two different
> unstable versions? Is this really the right thing to do?
In what sense do you consider 6.2 stable? Stable as compared to
I think a part of the problem here - not the only part - is that you
are using idiosyncratic definitions of terms.
Clifton Royston -- cliftonr at iandicomputing.com / cliftonr at lava.net
President - I and I Computing * http://www.iandicomputing.com/
Custom programming, network design, systems and network consulting services
More information about the freebsd-stable