Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)

[Alfred Perlstein]

* John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> [080605 07:58] wrote:
> On Thursday 05 June 2008 02:19:31 am Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd.org> [080604 11:12] wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > > BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that
> > > > freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases.
> > > 
> > > Yes, kmail is broken and the authors refuse to fix it.  It happens on reply to 
> > > a foo@ e-mail (it changes the 'To' to 'freebsd-foo@' because of the List-Id 
> > > header and leaves foo@ in the 'CC' field).  Note that there isn't anything in 
> > > the List headers that says that foo@ is an alias for freebsd-foo at .  I just 
> > > wish I could turn off the List-Id crap and use plain old reply-to-all, but 
> > > that is where the kmail developers disagree.
> > 
> > wtf.....why not just have a checkbox to toggle the behavior?
> 
> That was my request (and I found at least 2 other open bugs for the same issue
> when I looked again yesterday).  The developers reply was "an option is not an
> option".

Did you try sending him email with forged headers a few times with
List-Id set to something embarassing?

What's his email?  I'll do it.

-Alfred