Hard(?) lock when reassociating ath with wpa_supplicant on RELENG_7

Sam Leffler sam at freebsd.org
Sun Jul 13 04:26:37 UTC 2008


Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 09:57 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
>   
>> Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
>>     
>>> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 20:29 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 12:23 -0400, Sam Leffler wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 19:33 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: 
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> I seem to be able to lock my machine by going into wpa_cli and asking it
>>>>>>>>> to 'reassoc'. The reason for question mark after "hard" is that debug
>>>>>>>>> information (caused by wlandebug and athdebug) is being printed on the
>>>>>>>>> console. The only way to get machine's attention is to hold power button
>>>>>>>>> for 8 seconds.
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> So this is just livelock due to console debug msgs.
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> I am not sure, I have parsed this well enough, so I will try to clarify:
>>>>>>> machine becomes unresponsive *without* any debugging turned on, to an
>>>>>>> extent that pressing the power button twice *does not* generate ACPI
>>>>>>> console message (something to the tune of "going into S5 already --
>>>>>>> gimme a break"). If I turn ath debugging on, I do see those messages,
>>>>>>> and only them, scrolling on the console.
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Guess I misunderstood you.
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> I have finally got enough time and equipment to investigate this
>>>>> further. Here are some conclusions:
>>>>>
>>>>> -- at this point (RELENG_7 as of July 9th around 15:30 EST) it is indeed
>>>>> a livelock.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- all system does, is executing ath_intr (if_ath.c) in the tight loop
>>>>> with the same status -- 0x1000 AKA HAL_INT_MIB. In order to eliminate
>>>>> possibility that I have caused livelock with the debug messages, I have
>>>>> put conditional panic() into ath_intr, as soon as sc->sc_stats.ast_mib
>>>>> reaches 10,000. Without any kind of the debug messages, it will be
>>>>> triggered within 40-60 seconds after starting of wpa_supplicant.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- I suspect that comment below, might not hold true on my equipment
>>>>> if (status & HAL_INT_MIB) {
>>>>>    sc->sc_stats.ast_mib++;
>>>>>    /*
>>>>>     * Disable interrupts until we service the MIB
>>>>>     * interrupt; otherwise it will continue to fire.
>>>>>     */
>>>>>    ath_hal_intrset(ah, 0);
>>>>>    /*
>>>>>     * Let the hal handle the event.  We assume it will <============
>>>>>     * clear whatever condition caused the interrupt.   <============
>>>>>     */
>>>>>     ath_hal_mibevent(ah, &sc->sc_halstats);
>>>>>     ath_hal_intrset(ah, sc->sc_imask);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> My hardware is:
>>>>> ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413,
>>>>> RF5413)
>>>>> ath0: <Atheros 5212> mem 0xedf00000-0xedf0ffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on
>>>>> pci3
>>>>> ath0: [ITHREAD]
>>>>> ath0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface
>>>>> ath0: Ethernet address: 00:16:cf:26:2f:3f
>>>>> ath0: mac 10.3 phy 6.1 radio 10.2
>>>>>
>>>>> My wpa_supplicant.conf is:
>>>>> ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
>>>>> ctrl_interface_group=wheel
>>>>> eapol_version=2
>>>>>
>>>>> network={
>>>>>   ssid="XXXXXXXXXXX"
>>>>>   scan_ssid=1
>>>>>   priority=1
>>>>>   proto=WPA
>>>>>   pairwise=TKIP
>>>>>   group=TKIP
>>>>>   key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
>>>>>   psk="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Access point is Netgear WNDR3300-1B with 11N and 11G SSID set up to
>>>>> different values. Only 11G SSID is configured in wpa_supplicant.conf. In
>>>>> the test setup, AP is with 10' (3m) from the laptop.
>>>>>
>>>>> AP is successfully used by handful of Windows clients (including this
>>>>> same laptop) and iBook G4.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither wpa_supplicant with '-d -d' nor wlandebug 0xFFFFFFFF show
>>>>> anything but normal scan. 
>>>>>
>>>>> athdebug 0xFFFFFFFF loops with ath_intr: status 0x1000 until I power
>>>>> down my laptop.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would appreciate any suggestion on what I can investigate further --
>>>>> at this point I have comfortable console setup and should be able to
>>>>> field requests for further information much better.
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Are you running powerd?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I do. And I just tried disabling it, and I could not reproduce the
>>> problem any more. Is there any way to reconcile if_ath with powerd?
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Don't know.  There appear to be two issues.  When the MIB interrupts 
>> arrive the kernel may service them w/ the cpu at a reduced clock 
>> frequency.  Since powered is currently the only mechanism for increasing 
>> the frequency and it runs in user space it can take a while to bump the 
>> clock rate leading to livelock (because the logic to reduce the _cause_ 
>> of the MIB interrupt takes a long time to run).  John Baldwin suggested 
>> raising the clock frequency when handling interrupts in the kernel but 
>> nothing has been done to make that happen.
>>
>> Separately there is a question as to why the MIB interrupts are 
>> happening at all.  This is possibly due to misprogramming of the 
>> baseband h/w in the ath card.  Unfortunately I've been trying to get 
>> Atheros to help understand/resolve this question for a very long time 
>> (as their code also exhibits this behaviour) but they've been 
>> unresponsive.  I have some experimental code to address this in new hal 
>> versions (such as 0.10.5.6 available in http://www.freebsd.org/~sam) but 
>> apparently it does not entirely fix the problem.
>>     
> Would it be of any value to you, if I build the new hal and see what
> happen? I can live without powerd as the workaround, but I'd rather help
> if I can.
>
>   
Testing the latest hal is always useful but I've not MFC'd many ath 
changes to RELENG_7 and some people have reported problems on RELENG_7 
w/ the new hal that do not occur on HEAD.

    Sam



More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list