Scheduler in Various Docs

Stephen Montgomery-Smith stephen at math.missouri.edu
Sun Jan 20 10:12:52 PST 2008


Jason C. Wells wrote:
> The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with 
> information found in the email archives.  LINT says ULE is experimental. 
>     The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say ULE is the 
> new recommended scheduler.
> 
> If ULE is in fact the current recommendation, then a few docs need to be 
> updated.

To add to Jason's point - why does GENERIC still default to SCHED_4BSD? 
  Are there plans to change this before 7.0 is truly released?



More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list