To 6.3 or to 7.0 that is the question?

Xin LI delphij at delphij.net
Fri Jan 18 13:26:53 PST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steven Hartland wrote:
> With the announcement of 6.3 and with 7.0 looking like it wont be far
> behind I'd interested to hear what people thought of the relative
> benefits of each where?
> 
> I know 7 has had a lot of work done on locking and ULE but are there
> any other reasons to go for that instead of 6.3? Conversely are there
> any reason which would point away from 7 such as stability issues?

7.0 is relatively new, while 6.3 would be a more conservative choice of
release if you have a lot of binaries running on previous release
because there are less changes.  However, I think it's good to use 7.0
as a development platform for future applications as there are a lot of
performance/stability/feature additions that will never be simply MFC'ed
because we try hard to maintain API/ABI stability for -STABLE branches.

Cheers,
- --
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net>	http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHkRmRi+vbBBjt66ARAmaPAKCA7bJU2854yjBNNK0vkkkn9xy5kwCdGpLN
tqEIud77ODnRq3zB0QKYkrc=
=N/o9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list