ipfw2.c,v 1.76.2.17

[Eugene Grosbein]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:02:16PM +0300, pluknet wrote:

> Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA.
> I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation.
> 
> A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation
> of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value".
> 
> For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here
> and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the previous
> output format (other than reverting this revision).

That was fixed 8 months ago. Just upgrade to 6.4.

Eugene Grosbein