Building -STABLE without option SMP?

O. Hartmann ohartman at zedat.fu-berlin.de
Wed Aug 27 15:02:02 UTC 2008


I also needed to comment out "options MAC" preventing the kernel build 
to stop premature (although I included options KDTRACE_HOOKS in the 
kernel config file).

Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When I build -STABLE as of today, with only option SMP commented out in
> GENERIC, I get the following error:
> 
> In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/cyclic/../../cddl/dev/cyclic/cyclic.c:1364:
> /usr/src/sys/modules/cyclic/../../cddl/dev/cyclic/i386/cyclic_machdep.c: In function 'xcall':
> /usr/src/sys/modules/cyclic/../../cddl/dev/cyclic/i386/cyclic_machdep.c:132: error: 'smp_no_rendevous_barrier' undeclared (first use in this function)
> /usr/src/sys/modules/cyclic/../../cddl/dev/cyclic/i386/cyclic_machdep.c:132: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> /usr/src/sys/modules/cyclic/../../cddl/dev/cyclic/i386/cyclic_machdep.c:132: error: for each function it appears in.)
> 
> It's probably the DTrace stuff that just got committed?  Anyway, it
> would be nice to be able to build for single-processor.  It's one of
> those cases the LINT build doesn't catch... :)
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list