2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD
lol at chistydom.ru
Fri Nov 30 01:07:50 PST 2007
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> One more patch which may or may not help is:
> (may also require porting since it was against an older version of
> 7.0-CURRENT). When I have tested this in the past it was a performance
> loss for reasons that I think I understand (basically, it is locally a
> performance improvement for the name cache but also requires a fixed
> lockmgr to avoid an overall performance loss), but I don't remember if I
> tested it in conjunction with the lockmgr patch.
This patch doesn't apply to 7-STABLE because /sys/kern/vfs_cache.c was
changed significanly since rev. 1.108. I tried to patch it manually but
don't know what to do with cache_lookup() changes.
>>> There are patches you need to enable it on woodcrest. They are in my
>>> p4 branch (kris-contention) but I don't have time right now to
>>> extract them.
>> I think it would be very useful because I can't see any other ways to
>> profile FreeBSD on the modern many-cores machines.
> You can extract the changeset from my branch via
> http://perforce.freebsd.org. Unfortunately I don't have time to do it
I'll try it if it does not also need porting.
With best regards,
More information about the freebsd-stable