Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed

Ivan Voras ivoras at fer.hr
Wed Mar 7 16:35:09 UTC 2007


Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100
> Ivan Voras <ivoras at fer.hr> wrote:
> 
>> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
>>
>>> BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1)
>> Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the
>> nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now
>> most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different
>> baselines and results from the "normal" version?
> 
> It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com.
> 
> It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark.

Beautiful - they fiddled with the baselines but still managed not to see
the obvious problem in execl() call in the execl benchmark for 64-bit
platforms.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20070307/db28ded3/signature.pgp


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list