how much beer do I need to get this patch applied?
javier at kjsl.com
Wed Jun 20 17:21:13 UTC 2007
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>>> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change
>>>> current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many,
>>>> many systems to not get useless e-mail.
>>>> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done...
>>> I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when
>>> everything is OK?
>> So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to
> If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or
> without this patch.
I'm just referring to the assertion that the Unix model is to be quiet when everything is OK. Maybe it's a personal preference, I guess.
More information about the freebsd-stable