call for ALTQ users

[Alexey Karagodov]

i has no 10G interfaces, but if i can help ... i'm using 200Mbit internet,
gigabit intranet, any type of traffic, voip, http etc etc

2007/7/29, OutBackDingo <outbackdingo at gmail.com>:
>
> Sounds exactly like what we do, multiple queues on bonded high speed
> 10G interfaces
>
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:53:36 -0700
> "Kip Macy" <kip.macy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7/28/07, Alexey Karagodov <karagodov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > how can i help you?
> >
> > I'd like to understand how ALTQ is being used currently. Are there
> > users using it on high bandwidth interfaces?
> >
> > As currently implemented it would force serialization, increased
> > locking overhead, and potentially loss of locality on cards that
> > support multiple queues (i.e. most 10GigE cards).
> >
> >      -Kip
> >
> > >
> > > 2007/7/29, Kip Macy <kip.macy at gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Expanding the net a bit.
> > > >
> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > From: Kip Macy <kip.macy at gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Jul 28, 2007 2:03 PM
> > > > Subject: call for ALTQ users
> > > > To: freebsd-net <freebsd-net at freebsd.org>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking at extending ifnet to support multiple tx queues. It
> > > > appears that this will inevitably interact with ALTQ. I don't know
> > > > anyone using ALTQ so I need users to raise their hands to
> > > > eventually test prospective changes.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >        -Kip
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@
> > > freebsd.org"
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>