Loosing spam fight

Roland Smith rsmith at xs4all.nl
Sat Jan 27 14:10:56 UTC 2007


On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:58:46AM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:

> also a point to think about, most complains about spam talk about bandwidth 
> consumption, by asking for resend later you certainly increase bandwidth 
> consumption and resources on both sides

Most spammers do not bother to return if they get a resend request.
That's the whole point of doing this. So practically it doesn't increase
bandwidth consumption.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith                                   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20070127/f9b4410d/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list