Loosing spam fight

JoaoBR joao at matik.com.br
Fri Jan 26 11:25:52 UTC 2007


On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:18, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> JoaoBR <joao at matik.com.br> writes:
> > all this methods are certainly useless, stay calm ok
>
> I fully sympathize with your need to rant, but in this context most of
> what you say is really quite beside the point.  Please read what the
> material at the links provided actually says.
>

the articles you linked show how to implement pf

like I said, for my understandings firewall implemention for spam fighting is 
wrong

because you reject the message

unless you are the man of a corporate network you do have *NO* right to decide 
which message your users receive or not. May be some *WANT* viagra offers and 
others *WANT* a bigger penis

so the only correct decision is to filter spam and put it into a spam folder 
where the user can review it and decide by his own if want it or not

but may be, to change your opinion,  you need to loose a case being 
responsible for some having a small penis and pay him his losses hihihihi, 
100k/inch or something hihihi

laugh with me and have a good day :)


-- 

João







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list