6.x loosing record of free space after filesystem fills?
Guy Helmer
ghelmer at palisadesys.com
Tue Jan 9 18:49:37 UTC 2007
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Guy Helmer wrote:
> > I think we've finally found the cause of the problem - it wasn't just
> > occurring after heavy use, but was visible right after filesystem
> > creation! We regularly built new filesystems with "newfs -U -O 1 -b
> > 65536 -f 8192"
>
> Why are you using those blocksize and fragsize settings?
> (If you store large files, then you should at least also
> decrease the inode density, using the -i option.)
>
These settings were chosen to optimize I/O throughput for Postgresql on
the theory that a 64KB block size would maximize disk throughput in the
general case (especially for a RAID 10 system) and an 8K frag size would
match Postgresql's page size.
I wasn't aware of any known regressions in 6.x regarding large
filesystem block sizes...
> Some time ago, Joe Greco wrote:
> > > the one unusual thing about the configuration is that the filesystem
> > > we are attempting to build on is a 136GB ccd across 4 scsi disks with
> > > the fsize=8192 and the bsize=65536 (it is mainly to be used for large
> > > data log files):
> >
> > FreeBSD doesn't support fsize/bsize so large. There are ongoing issues
> > within the filesystem code and VM code that will cause such filesystems
> > to break under heavy load. Matt Dillon also talked about this being less-
> > than-optimal for the VM system from some technical points of view.
>
> It has been a while, and I'm not sure if there are still
> problems with those non-standard fsize/bsize settings, but
> I would definitely try to avoid them for production use.
>
> Best regards
> Oliver
>
>
Thanks,
Guy
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list