Filesystem corruption and bad perfomance with SRCS16 and PAE
(raid 5 2TB)
matrix at itlegion.ru
Wed Feb 7 00:04:28 UTC 2007
Andras Gót wrote:
> Can you try the AMD64 version on that server?
Um.. i have never tried anything AMD in my life. I thought
AMD64 is only for AMD CPUs and this is Intel Xeon.
Are you really suggesting installing FreeBSD for AMD64
on this Xeon server? Why? Should it help?
> Artem Kuchin wrote:
>> I've got an Intel 2400A server to install FBSD. It has 4GB RAM,
>> SRCS16 raid controller, configured 2TB (actually a little less, about
>> 1.9TB) RAID-5 array, Xeon 3.2Ghz
>> Recently i have installed 6.2-R, cvsupped it to 6.2-STABLE
>> (today, thanks to included csup utility, very convinient) and
>> decided to turn on PAE so i can utilize all 4GB of RAM (w/o PAE
>> i am loosing 512MB, too bad).
>> I did that and then tried to run perl. Got "segmantaion fault".
>> Ignored that and tried to copy port tree and then i found
>> out that some files are damanged and connot be read. Also,
>> directoried could not be deleted because it is not empty, but when
>> i do ls in that dir it IS empty. weird.
>> Booted single user, did fsck - found a buch of errors, many
>> softupdate inconsistencies.
>> Fixed them. Rebooted (still in PAE). Run buildworld and
>> copy ports tree at the same time. AFter 10 minutes again the same
>> Built a kernel without PAE, installed, rebooted in single user,
>> fixed all filesystems, booted multiuser, run buildworld and copy of
>> ports tree. Everything is okay. Did it many times. Still everything
>> is ok.
>> Is it something bad about amr driver working under PAE?
>> Also, with and after running in PAE (i mean, run PAE kernel,
>> then install normal kernel and run it) the kernel compains like this
>> _vfs_done(): amrd0 [WRITE(offset=8192, length=1536)] error = 5
>> (no other message before or aftrer this, disks are fully okay
>> becuase dd works like a charm)
>> Also, i did a simple thing
>> dd if=/dev/amrd0 of=/dev/null bs=1M (tried 2m, 5m, 512k)
>> The throughoutput is about 29MB/sec w/o PAE and 27MB/sec with PAE
>> Did the same on a very old DUal Pentium III with 3Ware 7xxxx with
>> RAID-5 array and older harddrives. Got over 50Mb/sec.
>> unixbench show terrible number for file perfomance.
>> Why the heck amr is so slow?
>> Artem Kuchin
>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-stable