ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:55:42AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >>This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was
> >>that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed
> >>stable ...
> >
> >You mean like in the FreeBSD handbook?  It's not anyone else's fault
> >if you haven't read the documentation.
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html
> 
> I swear, the last time I searched for a definition of STABLE vs 
> CURRENT/HEAD, that wsan't there ... but, granted, that was a very very 
> long time ago ...

Well, now you know.  Might be a good idea to reread the handbook and
other documentation to bring yourself up to date on anything else you
might have missed too.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060910/3ba194eb/attachment.pgp