quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
ciscogeek at bgp4.net
Fri May 5 22:20:26 UTC 2006
Mike Jakubik wrote:
> arrive at the sacrifice of stability. I think FreeBSD should only be
> released when known major bugs are worked out. A known broken release to
> me and most new users is useless, lets not release simply for the sake
> of numbering.
For me, and many other quiet users, FreeBSD *IS* stable. I've been
running 6.1 since the BETAs with no issues. No, I don't use quotas. I
doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do.
> I wish i was a good Unix C programmer myself, so i could contribute in a
> more direct way (always hated those damn pointers),
You could always hire or help sponsor a developer to fix your pet issues.
More information about the freebsd-stable