quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
kris at obsecurity.org
Thu May 4 06:04:58 UTC 2006
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:54:58AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:41:57AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> >>Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>>You missed the part where snapshots have caused deadlocks under
> >>>varying conditions since day 1. They have never worked 100% reliably,
> >>>and despite our best efforts that will remain true with 6.1.
> >>Then why utilize a known non-functional technology?
> >Because again, the benefits have been judged by the decision-makers
> >and found to outweigh the drawbacks. Perhaps that's just a difficult
> >concept for some people to understand if they're used to thinking of
> >everything in binary terms.
> Yes, i am sorry, but i fail to understand why i would want to use
> something that i know does not work correctly. I think there are quite a
> few of those "drawbacks" that are pissed off.
If you don't want to use software that isn't 100% perfect, your only
hope is to turn off your computer forever.
That's my last word on the subject, thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060504/aecc3800/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-stable