FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ...
M.Hirsch
M.Hirsch at gmx.de
Mon Jun 26 21:37:25 UTC 2006
Nope,
I'd like my bank data to be stored on a system that does ECC, no question.
But please, on hard disk level (RAID; that is _permanent_), not in the
RAM of a single node.
If memory gets corrupted, please, raise a kernel panic... Even if
there's ECC in place.
Counter question:
Would you like your bank account data to be stored on a medium where one
failure can be corrected, two can be detected, but three go unnoticed?
How unlikely is that, if you've got some hardware that is really /broken/?
I know this is a rather random thing to happen.
Still, I think ECC memory is overrated. Better have it fail immediately.
_With a kernel panic, please_
M.
Wilko Bulte schrieb:
>Balderdash.
>
>Following your rationale you want your bank account data
>silently be corrupted by hardware with bit errors? Be my guest, give
>me ECC any day.
>
>Proper hardware will log the ECC errors, a proper OS tailored to that
>hardware will log and notify the sysadmins.
>
>That is how it should be done.
>
>Wilko
>
>
>
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list