pf buggy on 6.1-STABLE?

[Kian Mohageri]

I'm aware.  I meant that as "pass quick" (without any keep state) ;)

Kian

On 6/8/06, Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson at telia.com> wrote:
>
> Kian Mohageri wrote:
>
> > 'pass quick' (non-stateful) fixed the problems but I wasn't
> > satisfied with that for obvious reasons.
>
> The 'quick' keyword does not make the rule non-stateful, it only aborts
> further evaluation of the specific packet.
>
> See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#quick for more
> information.
>
> /Daniel Eriksson
>