pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
brooks at one-eyed-alien.net
Fri Jul 7 01:48:47 UTC 2006
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> >> Brooks Davis wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> >>>> I normally run the command
> >>>> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \<
> >>>> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output:
> >>>> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i3220.127.116.11.07.00 < needs updating (index has 1.5.0.07.00)
> >>>> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name.
> >>> Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is
> >>> "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i318.104.22.168.07.00". That's
> >>> just plain bogus.
> >> So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation?
> > I don't know. How did you install it?
> # pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i322.214.171.124.07.00.tbz
It definitly installs correctly if you use the port instead of the
package. It looks like the package is incorrect.
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060707/7de6ed88/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-stable