Which FreeBSD is the most stable for Dell PowerEdge 2850
Jim Keller
freebsd at contexthosting.net
Sat Jul 1 01:09:08 UTC 2006
Hi Dan,
It's usually best to go with the current production release. As
such, I would recommend going with the latest release of FreeBSD 6.
FreeBSD 5 is now a legacy release, so support for it will probably
start to fall off sooner rather than later. Also, as I understand it,
version 5 was plagued with various problems that are not present in 6.
Finally mySQL runs very well on FreeBSD 6, due to the new filesystem
and updated threading libraries.
-Jim Keller
http://www.contexthosting.net
Quoting Dan Charrois <dan at syz.com>:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I'm currently running the following:
>
> Hardware: Dell PowerEdge 2850 rack mounted server, Dual 3.4 Ghz Xeon,
> 5 Gb memory
> Hard Drives: LSILogic PERC 4e/Di, configured as RAID 5, with 3 X 40 Gb disks
> OS: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p6 for amd64
>
> It's sole purpose is to be an SQL server, and that's about the only
> thing that's running on it, namely:
>
> mysqld Ver 4.1.16 for portbld-freebsd5.4 on amd64 (FreeBSD port:
> mysql-server-4.1.16)
>
> The server is rather heavily loaded, and 8 or 9 months ago, I had
> problems with it spontaneously "hard" rebooting irregularly every few
> days to several weeks. All the hardware tested out fine, but it
> acted as if someone just pulled the plug and then plugged it back in
> (looking through the log files showed everything working fine, and
> then suddenly the logs would start showing messages from the boot
> sequence). Of course, the disks would then be scanned for errors,
> and sometimes the SQL databases needed repairs from the unexpected
> restart. There weren't real power fluctuations involved - the
> machine was on a building-wide UPS, and several other machines in the
> same cabinet plugged into the same power source never had issues -
> and the PowerEdge itself has two power supplies. I never was able
> to track down definitively what was causing the problem (especially
> since it was sporadic), but eventually found that by disabling
> hyperthreading, it never crashed again. I don't know why, or even
> if, it fixed anything, but since it hasn't crashed since then,
> haven't wanted to touch it.
>
> In any case, the server is used heavily all year except July, so this
> is my time of year to take things apart, update software, etc. And
> so I'm wondering - what is the recommended version of FreeBSD I
> should be running if stability is of the utmost importance? Should I
> migrate to the 6.x stream? Is it relatively solid? Or should I
> stay with 5.4 for now? I've seen some messages posted periodically
> from various people running into problems, but am wondering if it's
> just relatively isolated incidents or if there are fairly common
> problems with stability. I could keep running what I'm running now,
> but since this is the month to update things that are appropriate to
> update, I thought I'd ask. I don't want to stay with the 5.4
> release indefinitely if the cessation of security patches loom on
> the horizon. Plus, if 6.x is stable with hyperthreading, I'd like
> to turn it back on. I heard about the information disclosure
> vulnerability on hyperthreaded CPUs, but I'm under the impression
> that it can only be exploited by other local users. I'm the only
> user on that machine, so if so, that vulnerability shouldn't affect
> me, and I'd like to squeak out every bit of performance possible.
>
> I'll probably be upgrading to MySQL 5.0 along the way too, unless
> anyone has any horror stories to share there :-)
>
> Thanks for any help or advice you can give!
>
> Dan
> --
> Syzygy Research & Technology
> Box 83, Legal, AB T0G 1L0 Canada
> Phone: 780-961-2213
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list