Postfix and faststart

[Vivek Khera]

On Jan 8, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote:

> This idea has been discussed in the past, and it has a lot of  
> merit. I tend to have a fundamental opposition to adding new pseudo- 
> targets unless they are ABSOLUTELY necessary, since they add  
> complexity to the system and reduce flexibility with ordering.  
> However, this may actually be a case where it's both useful and  
> worth the cost.

It would certainly get rid of the need for naming the startup scripts  
like 000.foo.sh to force it to happen.