Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support

[JoaoBR]

On Friday 22 December 2006 16:06, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 08:09 am, Helge.Oldach at atosorigin.com wrote:
> > Pete French <> wrote on Friday, December 22, 2006 2:44 PM:
> > Frankly, I can't follow the argument that 6.x is "unstable". After all,
> > it's named 6-STABLE for a reason. I'd say from experience that the
>
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

v1.0

> Not for the reason you think.  -STABLE in FreeBSD means API/ABI stability,

v2.0

> not necessarily system stability.  It's a promise that a binary compiled
> on 6.0-RELEASE will run on 6.32-RELEASE without needing to recompile it

v11.0

> (with very few exceptions).

v45.0

it doesn't matter how many times it is told or not told at all, it will be 
ever and ever again told wrong again :)

(please note the odd numbers on certain versions :)  so be carefull  huh)



-- 

João







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br