Possibility for FreeBSD 4.11 Extended Support

[JoaoBR]

On Friday 22 December 2006 09:43, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Friday, 22. December 2006 03:59, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > spork at bway.net writes:
> > >-5.x was never really for production use, in the same way 3.x never
> > >was.
> >
> > Why do people continue to say this?
>
> Because everybody knows that odd numbered releases aren't stable. Just like
> .0 and .1 releases are rushed out the door after a few months of mad
> hackfest and patches being rushed back and forth on kernel.org. Smirk.

man, if that really is so then it has an easy solution, don't make 7. but make 
8. ... :)

but the better "believe" would be in better work instead of blaming odd 
release numbers




-- 

João







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br