link_elf: symbol cam_simq_alloc undefined
Eugene M. Kim
gene at nttmcl.com
Fri Apr 28 04:59:53 UTC 2006
Thanks, that fixed it! : )
scottl: Could you commit (and MFC) the fix? It's as simple as adding a
MODULE_DEPEND line:
MODULE_DEPEND(amr, cam, 1, 1, 1);
after the DRIVER_MODULE line in src/sys/dev/amr/amr_pci.c
I'm not sure about amr_linux though; it seems that there's no CAM
reference in amr_linux.c, but that amr_linux is just a compatibility
layer on top of amr. In that light, perhaps:
MODULE_DEPEND(amr_linux, amr, 1, 1, 1);
is in order. Also, the existing MODULE_DEPEND line probably should be
changed to:
MODULE_DEPEND(amr_linux, linux, 1, 1, 1);
Cheers,
Eugene
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Eugene M. Kim wrote this message on Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 19:55 -0700:
>> I'm trying to upgrade from 5-stable to 6-stable; after rebooting to the
>> new kernel, the amr(4) module (amr.ko) refuses to load with this message:
>>
>> link_elf: symbol cam_simq_alloc undefined
>>
>> However, a quick nm(1) on /boot/kernel/cam.ko does show:
>>
>> ...
>> 0000f0ac T cam_sim_set_path
>> 0000efc4 T cam_simq_alloc
>> 0000efd4 T cam_simq_free
>> ...
>>
>> and cam.ko is already loaded before amr.ko.
>>
>> What am I missing here? *scratches head 'o 'a*
>
> amr is missing a:
> MODULE_DEPEND(amr, cam, 1, 1, 1);
>
> which means the module doesn't get cam's symbols... might as well add
> that line to amr_linux.c next to MODULE_DEPEND already there...
>
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list