portsnap mirror servers

Benjamin Lutz benlutz at datacomm.ch
Fri Apr 21 12:40:33 UTC 2006


On Wednesday 19 April 2006 00:44, Colin Percival wrote:
> I have a list of people who have offered mirrors, but so far I haven't
> seen any need for additional mirrors -- the two which already exist are
> showing no signs of slowing down.

Hm, but I see a quite noticeable speed difference between portsnap1 and 
portsnap2. The second one is quite a bit faster.

Cheers
Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060421/b9afdd39/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list