Disappointed

[Stephen Clark]

[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:

>Alexey Karagodov wrote:
>  
>
>>hi.
>>i think, this unstablity happaning just because developers trying to make
>>two systems at one time, one is 6.0 and another 7.0 current and they
>>supporting old version, lower then 6.0
>>i want to ask developers, why you developing new system, 7.0, if you don't
>>finish old, 6.0 ?!
>>finish 6.0, make it work, and upgrade it to 7.0 and to 8.0 and to 9.0 and so
>>on ...
>>what so new and revolutionary in 7.0 in comparison with 6.0 ?!
>>to use your system i must be a DEVELOPER, but i don't have so much time! i
>>don't want to develope! i want to use, i want to help you with some advise (
>>e.g. what feature to add, what feature to change etc), i can and i want to
>>share some of my hardware to feet your needs, make a mirror, make a test
>>server/workstation/notebook/PDA etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just
>>admin and a user.
>>your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is
>>SOLARIS.
>>but your's is so unstable ...
>>    
>>
>
>All this is described in many places. It all comes down to this: if you
>don't want to be a developer, JUST USE THE RELEASE BRANCH. That means
>Releng_6_0 for now.
>
>Stable only means compatible to previous versions of the same branch.
>Not that the system is stable.
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>  
>
Who in their right mind would think that "stable" actually means "stable"!!!