Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

[Barkley Vowk]

No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was 
assigned to it.

I'd check on the running box but:
koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0
disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported

/dev only shows:
koth# ls /dev/da0*
/dev/da0        /dev/da0s1      /dev/da0s1c     /dev/da0s1d

So I expect it is all assigned to the one slice.

On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, David Kirchner wrote:

> On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk <bvowk at math.ualberta.ca> wrote:
>> I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64.
>>
>> Under 5.4-R I could have >1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not
>> having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too.
>>
>> However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic:
>>
>> /dev/da0s1d    723G     54G    611G     8%    /home
>>
>> Certainly not what I was hoping for.
>>
>> I've tried both i386 and amd64 releases.
>>
>> Especially since that apparent limit is much smaller than 1TB.
>
> Curious. Is there any remaining space for a second slice, as in da0s2?
>