Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:27:02AM -0500, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Thursday 03 November 2005 09:03 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:27:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > > >Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options ->
> > > >nooptions / i486_cpu -> no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC alone, but HOW
> > > >are things switched off?
> > >
> > > It appears to be an ommission in the file format.  I've e-mailed
> > > Ruslan, who implemented nodevice and nooption, to suggest that he also
> > > add nocpu. I wonder if there are other missed syntactic bits of note.
> >
> > I've committed a code that implements the "nocpu" directive, FWIW.
> 
> How about "nomakeoptions"?  Or is there already a way to do the equivalent?  
> 
Yes, "nomakeoption" exists since 2003, but I've just added the
"nomakeoptions" alias for consistency.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20051103/4423b11d/attachment.bin