Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS

[John Nielsen]

On Thursday 03 November 2005 09:03 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:27:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > >Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options ->
> > >nooptions / i486_cpu -> no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC alone, but HOW
> > >are things switched off?
> >
> > It appears to be an ommission in the file format.  I've e-mailed
> > Ruslan, who implemented nodevice and nooption, to suggest that he also
> > add nocpu. I wonder if there are other missed syntactic bits of note.
>
> I've committed a code that implements the "nocpu" directive, FWIW.

How about "nomakeoptions"?  Or is there already a way to do the equivalent?  
I just tried to rewrite my custom kernel using GENERIC as a starting point 
and didn't know how to override/remove the "makeoptions DEBUG=-g" line.

JN