Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (nbench results)
Kris Kennaway
kris at obsecurity.org
Tue May 24 12:36:20 PDT 2005
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 09:31:17PM +0200, Bohdan Horst wrote:
>
>
> I have 4 identical PC with FreeBSD (2x4.11R and 2x5.4R)
>
> Results (/usr/ports/net/benchmarks/nbench):
>
> (CPUTYPE=p3 in /etc/make.conf; portupgrade -vf nbench)
>
> tests:
> NUMERIC SORT: 4.11= 499.52 494.31 5.4= 451.26 449.7 (4.11 faster)
> STRING SORT: 4.11= 24.13 24.11 5.4= 25.286 25.294 (5.4 faster)
> BITFIELD(e+8) 4.11= 1.133 1.1319 5.4= 1.1239 1.1239 (4.11 faster)
> FP EMULATION 4.11= 18.951 18.755 5.4= 25.044 25.029 (5.4 faster)
> FOURIER 4.11= 5361 5356.3 5.4= 5076.3 5076.3 (4.11 faster)
> ASSIGNMENT 4.11= 5.4795 5.4469 5.4= 5.8986 5.8968 (5.4 faster)
> IDEA 4.11= 595.23 592.13 5.4= 660.65 660.65 (5.4 faster)
> HUFFMAN 4.11= 332.47 330.91 5.4= 409.06 408.95 (5.4 faster)
> NEURAL NET 4.11= 7.0374 6.9882 5.4= 7.2976 7.2955 (5.4 faster)
> LU DECOMP. 4.11= 225.94 226.76 5.4= 211.56 210.84 (4.11 faster)
> original:
> INTEGER INDEX 4.11= 12.305 12.238 5.4= 13.409 13.400 (5.4 faster)
> FLOATING-POINT 4.11= 9.309 9.296 5.4= 9.052 9.041 (4.11 faster)
> new:
> MEMORY INDEX 4.11= 3.321 3.313 5.4= 3.448 3.448 (5.4 faster)
> INTEGER INDEX 4.11= 2.895 2.873 5.4= 3.271 3.268 (5.4 faster)
> FLOATING-POINT 4.11= 5.163 5.156 5.4= 5.020 5.014 (4.11 faster)
>
>
>
> all 4 hosts have important services (w3cache, firewall, ircd, etc) and i
> cannot turn them off to perform good UFS1/UFS2 tests :(
Thanks, but if the machines are not completely idle then it's
impossible to tell whether these numbers are meaningful :-(
Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050524/df161e3e/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list