freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 10
Penerdzhy R.V.
prv0 at yandex.ru
Thu Mar 3 12:14:59 GMT 2005
Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request.
Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 15:00:42:
fsrfo> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to
fsrfo> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
fsrfo>
fsrfo> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
fsrfo> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fsrfo> freebsd-stable-request at freebsd.org
fsrfo> You can reach the person managing the list at
fsrfo> freebsd-stable-owner at freebsd.org
fsrfo> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
fsrfo> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..."
fsrfo> Today's Topics:
fsrfo> 1. Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 9 (Penerdzhy R.V.)
fsrfo> 2. Re: {Spam?} Re: can't get a crash dump (Roberto Nunnari)
fsrfo> 3. Re: Linking with CUPS Issue (Jake Stride)
fsrfo> 4. Re: Linking with CUPS Issue (Jake Stride)
fsrfo> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
fsrfo> Message: 1
fsrfo> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:28:58 +0300
fsrfo> From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0 at yandex.ru>
fsrfo> Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 9
fsrfo> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo> Message-ID: <1914821434.20050303142858 at yandex.ru>
fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251
fsrfo> Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request.
fsrfo> Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 14:20:03:
fsrfo>> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to
fsrfo>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
fsrfo>>
fsrfo>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
fsrfo>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fsrfo>> freebsd-stable-request at freebsd.org
fsrfo>> You can reach the person managing the list at
fsrfo>> freebsd-stable-owner at freebsd.org
fsrfo>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
fsrfo>> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..."
fsrfo>> Today's Topics:
fsrfo>> 1. Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 8 (Penerdzhy R.V.)
fsrfo>> 2. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 (Artem Kuchin)
fsrfo>> 3. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 (Gerald de la Pascua)
fsrfo>> 4. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10 (Artem Kuchin)
fsrfo>> 5. 1000baseTX? (Yoshiaki Kasahara)
fsrfo>> 6. Linking with CUPS Issue (Jake Stride)
fsrfo>> 7. Re: Dual booting with Windows XP (Jared Earle)
fsrfo>> 8. Need Help With mount_smbfs Error Message (Tim Daneliuk)
fsrfo>> 9. Re: Linking with CUPS Issue (Michael C. Shultz)
fsrfo>> 10. 4.11-RELEASE panics (Kirill Ponomarew)
fsrfo>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 1
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:16:35 +0300
fsrfo>> From: "Penerdzhy R.V." <prv0 at yandex.ru>
fsrfo>> Subject: Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 101, Issue 8
fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>> Message-ID: <1576425481.20050303111635 at yandex.ru>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251
fsrfo>> Здравствуйте, freebsd-stable-request.
fsrfo>> Вы писали 3 марта 2005 г., 11:09:56:
fsrfo>>> Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to
fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
fsrfo>>>
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
fsrfo>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable-request at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable-owner at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
fsrfo>>> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest..."
fsrfo>>> Today's Topics:
fsrfo>>> 1. Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD
fsrfo>>> 4.10 (Artem Kuchin)
fsrfo>>> 2. Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on
fsrfo>>> DellPowerEdge2800 ? (Art Mason)
fsrfo>>> 3. 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Thomas Krause)
fsrfo>>> 4. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Scot Hetzel)
fsrfo>>> 5. Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg
fsrfo>>> -s 1" (Doug Ambrisko)
fsrfo>>> 6. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (M. Warner Losh)
fsrfo>>> 7. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh)
fsrfo>>> 8. Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4 (M. Warner Losh)
fsrfo>>> 9. Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5 (Ruslan Ermilov)
fsrfo>>> 10. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Colin Percival)
fsrfo>>> 11. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes
fsrfo>>> (Freddie Cash)
fsrfo>>> 12. ueagle(4) driver merging (Mateusz J?drasik)
fsrfo>>> 13. Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes
fsrfo>>> (Peter Jeremy)
fsrfo>>> 14. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf)
fsrfo>>> 15. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman)
fsrfo>>> 16. Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001) (Kevin Oberman)
fsrfo>>> 17. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen)
fsrfo>>> 18. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor)
fsrfo>>> 19. Re: ueagle(4) driver merging (Daniel O'Connor)
fsrfo>>> 20. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Brian Behlendorf)
fsrfo>>> 21. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Daniel Eischen)
fsrfo>>> 22. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Pete French)
fsrfo>>> 23. Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites. (Eric Schuele)
fsrfo>>> 24. Dual booting with Windows XP (Didier Caamano)
fsrfo>>> 25. 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted) (Edwin Brown)
fsrfo>>> 26. Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled (Kris Kennaway)
fsrfo>>> 27. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> (Michael C. Shultz)
fsrfo>>> 28. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> (Edwin Brown)
fsrfo>>> 29. ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila)
fsrfo>>> 30. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> (Edwin Brown)
fsrfo>>> 31. Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> (Michael C. Shultz)
fsrfo>>> 32. Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>>> FreebBSD 4.10 (pete wright)
fsrfo>>> 33. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor)
fsrfo>>> 34. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor)
fsrfo>>> 35. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila)
fsrfo>>> 36. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (pcasidy at casidy.com)
fsrfo>>> 37. -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA (Emanuel Strobl)
fsrfo>>> 38. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Daniel O'Connor)
fsrfo>>> 39. Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source (Nicholas Basila)
fsrfo>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 1
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300
fsrfo>>> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix at itlegion.ru>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for FreebBSD
fsrfo>>> 4.10
fsrfo>>> To: "FreeBSD Stable" <freebsd-stable at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <024601c51f33$eda69e40$0c00a8c0 at artem>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1";
fsrfo>>> reply-type=original
fsrfo>>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2)
fsrfo>>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ?
fsrfo>>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE
fsrfo>>> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure).
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Regards,
fsrfo>>> Artem Kuchin
fsrfo>>> IT Legion Ltd.
fsrfo>>> Moscow, Russia
fsrfo>>> www.itlegion.ru
fsrfo>>> matrix at itlegion.ru
fsrfo>>> +7 095 232-0338
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 2
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:25:40 -0600
fsrfo>>> From: Art Mason <amason at rackspace.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ?
fsrfo>>> To: Vinny Abello <vinny at tellurian.com>
fsrfo>>> Cc: Kipp Holger <h.kipp at eurowings.com>
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4225CCE4.3080304 at rackspace.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> Yeah, I cam across that on some mailing list archives, but saw some
fsrfo>>> additional references that this can cause issues with the amr driver.
fsrfo>>> Have you experienced any instability issues with the amr driver and PAE
fsrfo>>> enabled? If not, then I'll give this a shot on one of our lab boxes for
fsrfo>>> testing. Thanks for the suggestion, BTW.
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Art Mason
fsrfo>>> Technical Support - Team F
fsrfo>>> Rackspace Managed Hosting
fsrfo>>> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290
fsrfo>>> amason at rackspace.com
fsrfo>>> Vinny Abello wrote:
>>>> FYI, the architecture of the 2850 (assuming it is similar to your 2800)
>>>> requires that you enable PAE support in your kernel of whatever OS you
>>>> run to address the full 4GB of RAM. This is due in some part because of
>>>> the memory mapping that was done for the PCI express bus and/or onboard
>>>> Perc controller (per Dell tech support). We've run into this with all of
>>>> our 2850's with various OS's and enabling PAE (per Dell's advice) fixes it.
>>>>
>>>> At 05:50 PM 3/1/2005, Art Mason wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, just installed on a customer's server last night, and I build
>>>>> SMP support into the GENERIC kernel this morning. Only issues I
>>>>> encountered has to do w/ recognizing the full 4GB of RAM, but this
>>>>> apparently has some compatibility issues w/ the amr driver.
>>>>> As per Holger's comments about disabling USB in BIOS, this is a good
>>>>> suggestion, since the DRAC apparently causes some IRQ issues w/ the
>>>>> PS/2 keyboard controller, or something along those lines. Regardless,
>>>>> these 2850 boxes are stupid fast, and I'm looking forward to
>>>>> benchmarking 5.3 on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Art Mason
>>>>> Technical Support - Team F
>>>>> Rackspace Managed Hosting
>>>>> (800) 961-4454 ext. 4290
>>>>> amason at rackspace.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kipp Holger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue 01.03.2005 17:49, lhmwzy wrote:
>>>>>> Please reply to hk at alogis dot com. This is not my native
>>>>>> account.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subject: Can FreeBSD be installed on DellPowerEdge2800 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anybody did this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any help is appreciateed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boot from FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-CD and install. No problems
>>>>>> so far. You might want to disable USB within BIOS, though,
>>>>>> because they seem to be shared with other critical devices
>>>>>> (nics and raidcontroller). But I don't use USB anyway.
>>>>>> Then you might want to upgrade to 5-STABLE.
>>>>>> This is on Dell PowerEdge 2800 with 2GB ECC RAM,
>>>>>> 4 x 36GB SCSI and amrd-Controller (PERC-4-something).
>>>>>> Binary copy of SAP 4.6C and Oracle 8 (from a working
>>>>>> installation on FreeBSD 4.x) works nearly without changes
>>>>>> (using emulators/linux_base-suse-9.1 and one additional
>>>>>> rpm (some compatibility-thing)).
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Holger Kipp
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vinny Abello
>>>> Network Engineer
>>>> Server Management
>>>> vinny at tellurian.com
>>>> (973)300-9211 x 125
>>>> (973)940-6125 (Direct)
>>>> PGP Key Fingerprint: 3BC5 9A48 FC78 03D3 82E0 E935 5325 FBCB 0100 977A
>>>>
>>>> Tellurian Networks - The Ultimate Internet Connection
>>>> http://www.tellurian.com (888)TELLURIAN
>>>>
>>>> "Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear"
>>>> -- Mark Twain
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 3
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET)
fsrfo>>> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable at chef-ingenieur.de>
fsrfo>>> Subject: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001)
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID:
fsrfo>>> <2481.212.78.101.51.1109776024.squirrel at mta.webmatic.de>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
fsrfo>>> Hello,
fsrfo>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running:
fsrfo>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp
fsrfo>>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd
fsrfo>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
fsrfo>>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd
fsrfo>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
fsrfo>>> gate:/ # ntpq
ntpq>>>> peers
fsrfo>>> No association ID's returned
fsrfo>>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine:
fsrfo>>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart
fsrfo>>> Stopping ntpd.
fsrfo>>> Starting ntpd.
fsrfo>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp
fsrfo>>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd
fsrfo>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
fsrfo>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001.
fsrfo>>> Kind regards,
fsrfo>>> Thomas.
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 4
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:53:59 -0600
fsrfo>>> From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel at gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001)
fsrfo>>> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable at chef-ingenieur.de>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <790a9fff05030207536d59cb17 at mail.gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET), Thomas Krause
fsrfo>>> <freebsd-stable at chef-ingenieur.de> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running:
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp
>>>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd
>>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
>>>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd
>>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # ntpq
>>>> ntpq> peers
>>>> No association ID's returned
>>>>
>>>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine:
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart
>>>> Stopping ntpd.
>>>> Starting ntpd.
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp
>>>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd
>>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
>>>>
>>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001.
>>>>
fsrfo>>> It could be that you have 2 scripts that are starting ntpd, check your
fsrfo>>> rc.d directories:
fsrfo>>> grep ntp /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*
fsrfo>>> Scot
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 5
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:09:22 -0800 (PST)
fsrfo>>> From: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko at ambrisko.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: "ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted" from "boot0cfg
fsrfo>>> -s 1"
fsrfo>>> To: David Wolfskill <david at catwhisker.org>
fsrfo>>> Cc: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503021609.j22G9MN3041308 at ambrisko.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> David Wolfskill writes:
fsrfo>>> | freebeast(5.4-P)[1] sudo boot0cfg -s 1 -v ad0
fsrfo>>> | Password:
fsrfo>>> | boot0cfg: /dev/ad0: ioctl DIOCSMBR: Operation not permitted
fsrfo>>> | freebeast(5.4-P)[2]
fsrfo>>> You might try:
fsrfo>>> sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16
fsrfo>>> Doug A.
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 6
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:13:22 -0700 (MST)
fsrfo>>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5
fsrfo>>> To: veldy at veldy.net
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302.091322.112684861.imp at bsdimp.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
fsrfo>>> In message: <421DE027.70204 at veldy.net>
fsrfo>>> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy at veldy.net> writes:
fsrfo>>> : Right away ... first thing!
fsrfo>>> :
fsrfo>>> :
fsrfo>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
: >>>>>> Installing everything
fsrfo>>> :
fsrfo>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
fsrfo>>> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
: ===>>>> share/info
fsrfo>>> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir
: ===>>>> include
fsrfo>>> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
fsrfo>>> : touch: not found
fsrfo>>> You have one of the canonical problems:
fsrfo>>> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine
fsrfo>>> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly
fsrfo>>> identical, in its canonical
fsrfo>>> form, between building machine and installing machine
fsrfo>>> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing.
fsrfo>>> Warner
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 7
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:14:15 -0700 (MST)
fsrfo>>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4
fsrfo>>> To: sirmoo at cowbert.2y.net
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302.091415.101560664.imp at bsdimp.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
fsrfo>>> In message: <20050224145622.GE261 at cowbert.2y.net>
fsrfo>>> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo at cowbert.2y.net> writes:
fsrfo>>> : Is there a way to build kernel modules by
fsrfo>>> themselves without having to
fsrfo>>> : build the entire kernel? I am adding umass
fsrfo>>> support to a 4.x machine but
fsrfo>>> : I don't want to build the entire kernel. I
fsrfo>>> already have scbus, but I need
fsrfo>>> : da and of course, umass.
fsrfo>>> cd src/sys/modules/umass ; make all install clean
fsrfo>>> This assumes that the sources match what's on the system.
fsrfo>>> Warner
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 8
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:15:16 -0700 (MST)
fsrfo>>> From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4
fsrfo>>> To: sirmoo at cowbert.2y.net
fsrfo>>> Cc: swhetzel at gmail.com
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302.091516.51358208.imp at bsdimp.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
fsrfo>>> In message: <20050224161305.GG261 at cowbert.2y.net>
fsrfo>>> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo at cowbert.2y.net> writes:
fsrfo>>> : On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
: >>>> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai
: >>>> <sirmoo at cowbert.2y.net> wrote:
: >>>> > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to
: >>>> > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but
: >>>> > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need
: >>>> > da and of course, umass.
: >>>> >
: >>>>
: >>>> Yes you can build modules seperately from a kernel build
: >>>>
: >>>> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass
: >>>> make obj
: >>>> make
: >>>> make install
: >>>>
: >>>> Scot
fsrfo>>> :
fsrfo>>> : ok. what about da? i don't have that in my
fsrfo>>> kernel, even though i have scbus.
fsrfo>>> : I think i'm just going to recompile the entire kernel anyway; I was just
fsrfo>>> : trying to not have to back-cvs /usr/src to patch the current one I have
fsrfo>>> : installed. (the more basic problem is i really
fsrfo>>> should be keeping multiple
fsrfo>>> : versions of /usr/src around for different
fsrfo>>> versions on different machines,
fsrfo>>> : but that is a separate problem).
fsrfo>>> modules/cam is what you want. Hmmm, looks like you have part of it in
fsrfo>>> your kernel already, so you'll not be able to do what you want.
fsrfo>>> Warner
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 9
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:45 +0200
fsrfo>>> From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru at FreeBSD.org>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Build install error in latest RELENG_5
fsrfo>>> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com>
fsrfo>>> Cc: veldy at veldy.net
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302165645.GB49216 at ip.net.ua>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
fsrfo>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 09:13:22AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>>>> In message: <421DE027.70204 at veldy.net>
>>>> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy at veldy.net> writes:
>>>> : Right away ... first thing!
>>>> :
>>>> : --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> : >>> Installing everything
>>>> : --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> : cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
>>>> : ===> share/info
>>>> : install -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir
>>>> : ===> include
>>>> : creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
>>>> : touch: not found
>>>>
>>>> You have one of the canonical problems:
>>>>
>>>> (1) Time skew between building machine and installing machine
>>>> (2) The path to the sources isn't exactly identical, in its canonical
>>>> form, between building machine and installing machine
>>>> (3) MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is different between building and installing.
>>>>
fsrfo>>> Besides, for NFS installs (by mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj and doing
fsrfo>>> install) to work at all, the following conditions all must be met:
fsrfo>>> 1) Architecture on both machines should be the same,
fsrfo>>> 2) CPUs on both machines should be compatible [*],
fsrfo>>> 3) FreeBSD versions should be IDENTICAL,
fsrfo>>> 4) The contents of /etc/make.conf should be compatible.
fsrfo>>> [*] Or the world on the build machine should be built with CFLAGS
fsrfo>>> compatible with the CPU on the install machine.
fsrfo>>> Cheers,
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Ruslan Ermilov
fsrfo>>> ru at FreeBSD.org
fsrfo>>> FreeBSD committer
fsrfo>>> -------------- next part --------------
fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
fsrfo>>> Name: not available
fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes
fsrfo>>> Desc: not available
fsrfo>>> Url :
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/434f456b/attachment-0001.bin
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 10
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000
fsrfo>>> From: Colin Percival <cperciva at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001)
fsrfo>>> To: Thomas Krause <freebsd-stable at chef-ingenieur.de>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4225F4A6.8010200 at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
fsrfo>>> Thomas Krause wrote:
>>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running:
>>>> [...]
>>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001.
fsrfo>>> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and
fsrfo>>> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running.
fsrfo>>> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then
fsrfo>>> goes into an infinite loop.
fsrfo>>> Colin Percival
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 11
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:20:42 -0800
fsrfo>>> From: Freddie Cash <fcash-ml at sd73.bc.ca>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503020920.43155.fcash-ml at sd73.bc.ca>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
fsrfo>>> On March 2, 2005 02:46 am, Rob wrote:
>>>> In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported
>>>> sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and
>>>> absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only
>>>> decoration, or really needed. For example:
>>>> device "snd_ad1816"
>>>> device snd_cmi
>>>> If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound
>>>> device needs quotes, and another doesn't?
fsrfo>>> You have to put quotes around any device names with numbers in them. If
fsrfo>>> you don't, the kernel config will error out.
>>>> How does that affect the use of loading them in
>>>> /boot/loader.conf? How about following two:
fsrfo>>> It doesn't affect loader.conf. You only put quotes around the value of
fsrfo>>> the variable ("YES" or "NO") not around the variable names.
>>>> snd_ad1816_load="YES"
>>>> snd_cmi_load="YES"
>>>> Is that OK?
fsrfo>>> Yes.
fsrfo>>> However, if you add the devices to the kernel config file, you don't
fsrfo>>> need to add them to loader.conf. loader.conf is used to load kernel
fsrfo>>> modules. You need to decide whether to compile all devices into the
fsrfo>>> kernel, or load some as kernel modules.
fsrfo>>> Personally, I like to put devices that won't change (like USB, ATA, SMB,
fsrfo>>> etc) into the kernel config file. And load devices that will change
fsrfo>>> (like NICs, soundcards, etc) as modules via loader.conf. Saves time
fsrfo>>> and effort when I decide to swap out NICs and test soundcards and
fsrfo>>> similar.
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech.
fsrfo>>> School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357]
fsrfo>>> fcash-ml at sd73.bc.ca
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 12
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:55:23 +0100
fsrfo>>> From: Mateusz J?drasik<imachine at toya.net.pl>
fsrfo>>> Subject: ueagle(4) driver merging
fsrfo>>> To: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4225FE0B.1000604 at toya.net.pl>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> Hi,
fsrfo>>> I wonder how is the FreeBSD team looking on the driver ueagle written by
fsrfo>>> one Damien Bergamini. It is a ADSL modem driver which connects using
fsrfo>>> USB, a quite popular solution in Poland, and France as well, aparently.
fsrfo>>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem
fsrfo>>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver?
fsrfo>>> I would really like to see such a driver supported inside of the FreeBSD
fsrfo>>> system itself since it would make me feel much more comfortable using a
fsrfo>>> somewhat FreeBSD oficially supported code than third party patching.
fsrfo>>> Here follows some more information regarding the project:
fsrfo>>> http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ueagle/index.html
fsrfo>>> Cheers,
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Mateusz Jкdrasik <imachine at toya.net.pl>
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 13
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:51:36 +1100
fsrfo>>> From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy at optushome.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: kernel config: sound device with or without quotes
fsrfo>>> To: Rob <spamrefuse at yahoo.com>
fsrfo>>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302185136.GA2302 at cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2005-Mar-02 02:46:41 -0800, Rob wrote:
>>>>In /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES is the list of supported
>>>>sound devices. I get confused by the pressence and
>>>>absence of quotes here. Are these quotes only
>>>>decoration, or really needed. For example:
>>>>
>>>>device "snd_ad1816"
>>>>device snd_cmi
>>>>
>>>>If they are needed, it confuses me why one sound
>>>>device needs quotes, and another doesn't?
fsrfo>>> For hysterical raisins, config(8) parses bareword arguments to "device" as
fsrfo>>> <perl>
fsrfo>>> ($device_name, $device_instance) = /([a-zA-Z_]+)([0-9]*)/;
fsrfo>>> </perl>
fsrfo>>> The double quotes force the first entry to be treated as a device
fsrfo>>> "snd_ad1816", rather than the 1817th instance of "snd_ad".
>>>>How does that affect the use of loading them in
>>>>/boot/loader.conf? How about following two:
>>>>
>>>>snd_ad1816_load="YES"
>>>>snd_cmi_load="YES"
>>>>
>>>>Is that OK?
fsrfo>>> Yes. The loader has a different parsing algorithm:
fsrfo>>> ${device_name}_load="{YES,NO}"
fsrfo>>> and
fsrfo>>> hint.$device_name.$device_instance.flag="VALUE"
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Peter Jeremy
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 14
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:06:27 -0800 (PST)
fsrfo>>> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian at collab.net>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites.
fsrfo>>> To: Ruben van Staveren <ruben at verweg.com>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302150553.N84651 at paz.hyperreal.org>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 12:23:42AM +0200, Ege Mukan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nowavadays whenever I want to surf on websites which contains flash
>>>>> things my firefox or mozilla shuts itself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you ever encounter this problem. And if you'd how did you eliminate ???
>>>>
>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ?
>>>>
>>>> (as in
>>>>
>>>> Section "Extensions"
>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable"
>>>> EndSection
>>>>
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh
>>>>
>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1
fsrfo>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and
fsrfo>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12.
fsrfo>>> Brian
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 15
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:07:55 -0800
fsrfo>>> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman at es.net>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001)
fsrfo>>> To: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable at chef-ingenieur.de>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302230755.7A0F05D07 at ptavv.es.net>
>>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:07:04 +0100 (CET)
>>>> From: "Thomas Krause" <freebsd-stable at chef-ingenieur.de>
>>>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running:
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp
>>>> root 407 0.0 0.7 2944 1752 ?? Ss 3:54PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd
>>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
>>>> root 417 0.0 0.7 2944 1776 ?? S 3:54PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/ntpd
>>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # ntpq
>>>> ntpq> peers
>>>> No association ID's returned
>>>>
>>>> After restarting, I've one daemon and all is running fine:
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # /etc/rc.d/ntpd restart
>>>> Stopping ntpd.
>>>> Starting ntpd.
>>>>
>>>> gate:/ # ps auxw | grep ntp
>>>> root 566 0.0 0.7 2944 1784 ?? Ss 4:04PM 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/ntpd
>>>> -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
>>>>
>>>> Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001.
fsrfo>>> Either you have two commands to start ntpd in
fsrfo>>> /etc/rc.d or (more likely)
fsrfo>>> the parent process is never exiting. When ntpd starts, it forks a child
fsrfo>>> process (the daemon) and exits. I have seen cases where the parent
fsrfo>>> process never exits because the child never properly starts.
fsrfo>>> That said, I have never seen this happen on a FreeBSD system, so it may
fsrfo>>> be that you are starting it twice. But this seems a bit unlikely as the
fsrfo>>> second daemon should exit immediately because the network socket is
fsrfo>>> already in use. But it's possible that they are stating so close
fsrfo>>> together that a race condition is locking things up. (Just speculation.)
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
fsrfo>>> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
fsrfo>>> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
fsrfo>>> E-mail: oberman at es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 16
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:11:23 -0800
fsrfo>>> From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman at es.net>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 2 ntpd (5.3-STABLE-SNAP001)
fsrfo>>> To: Colin Percival <cperciva at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302231123.D14555D07 at ptavv.es.net>
>>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:15:18 +0000
>>>> From: Colin Percival <cperciva at freebsd.org>
>>>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
>>>>
>>>> Thomas Krause wrote:
>>>> > when starting ntpd at boot time, I've 2 ntpd's running:
>>>> > [...]
>>>> > Any idea why? I' running 5.3-STABLE-SNAP001.
>>>>
>>>> 1. You have some host names in ntp.conf which need to be resolved, and
>>>> 2. At the time ntpd starts, the resolver isn't running.
>>>>
>>>> For some reason, ntpd makes one attempt to look up names in DNS and then
>>>> goes into an infinite loop.
fsrfo>>> Good idea. Yes, the DNS resolution in ntpd is really, really stupid. I
fsrfo>>> always specify addresses in ntp.conf for this reason and the fact that
fsrfo>>> it there are multiple addresses only the first returned will be
fsrfo>>> tried. It never fails over if that one is dead. (And, should an IPv6
fsrfo>>> address be available on a system that does not have IPv6
fsrfo>>> connectivity...).
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
fsrfo>>> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
fsrfo>>> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
fsrfo>>> E-mail: oberman at es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 17
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:56:36 -0500 (EST)
fsrfo>>> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites.
fsrfo>>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian at collab.net>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID:
fsrfo>>> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021855350.28715-100000 at sea.ntplx.net>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ?
>>>> >
>>>> > (as in
>>>> >
>>>> > Section "Extensions"
>>>> > Option "Composite" "Enable"
>>>> > EndSection
>>>> >
>>>> > )
>>>> >
>>>> > Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh
>>>> >
>>>> > export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1
>>>>
>>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and
>>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12.
fsrfo>>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace
fsrfo>>> out of it?
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> DE
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 18
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030
fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Cc: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote:
>>>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem
>>>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver?
fsrfo>>> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send
fsrfo>>> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices.
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there
fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from."
fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum
fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
fsrfo>>> -------------- next part --------------
fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
fsrfo>>> Name: not available
fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes
fsrfo>>> Desc: not available
fsrfo>>> Url :
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0002.bin
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 19
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:43:43 +1030
fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ueagle(4) driver merging
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Cc: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031043.52675.doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:25, Mateusz Jкdrasik wrote:
>>>> Is the idea of FreeBSD to merge such driver as a hack to the umodem
>>>> code, or to stay in tune with Damien's solution and merge the whole driver?
fsrfo>>> umodem is for serial modems not ADSL. I believe ADSL modems tend to send
fsrfo>>> either ATM or ethernet frames whereas umodem deals with RS232 like devices.
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there
fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from."
fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum
fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
fsrfo>>> -------------- next part --------------
fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
fsrfo>>> Name: not available
fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes
fsrfo>>> Desc: not available
fsrfo>>> Url :
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/abd25763/attachment-0003.bin
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 20
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:16:22 -0800 (PST)
fsrfo>>> From: Brian Behlendorf <brian at hyperreal.org>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites.
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050302161410.X84651 at paz.hyperreal.org>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (as in
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Section "Extensions"
>>>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable"
>>>>>> EndSection
>>>>>>
>>>>>> )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #! /bin/sh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1
>>>>>
>>>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and
>>>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace
>>>> out of it?
fsrfo>>> Because, as I said earlier this thread:
fsrfo>>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it
fsrfo>>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I
fsrfo>>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I
fsrfo>>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone
fsrfo>>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day
fsrfo>>> lighten up and let Mozilla
fsrfo>>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something.
fsrfo>>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a
fsrfo>>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to
fsrfo>>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom
fsrfo>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work?
fsrfo>>> Brian
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 21
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:31:36 -0500 (EST)
fsrfo>>> From: Daniel Eischen <deischen at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites.
fsrfo>>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian at hyperreal.org>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID:
fsrfo>>> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0503021926300.28715-100000 at sea.ntplx.net>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace
>>>> > out of it?
>>>>
>>>> Because, as I said earlier this thread:
>>>>
>>>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it
>>>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I
>>>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I
>>>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone
>>>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla
>>>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something.
>>>>
>>>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a
>>>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response to
>>>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom
>>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work?
fsrfo>>> Is it that hard to type 'firefox -g', alias firefox="firefox -g", or
fsrfo>>> whatever, and use it that way for a few days to see if you can
fsrfo>>> get a trace? I'm just wondering if it has the same problem
fsrfo>>> as linuxpluginwrapper, or bad assumptions about mutexes
fsrfo>>> being recursive or unlocking one you don't own.
fsrfo>>> Most folks I know use the linuxpluginwrapper so we don't have
fsrfo>>> any experience with the native flash player. I think I recall
fsrfo>>> trying it and it not working, hence the use of linuxpluginwrapper.
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> DE
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 22
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:54:23 +0000
fsrfo>>> From: Pete French <petefrench at ticketswitch.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites.
fsrfo>>> To: brian at hyperreal.org, freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <E1D6ebf-000Dcm-Ut at dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
>>>> Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom
>>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work?
fsrfo>>> No, it doesnt work for me either - but I dont care enough about
fsrfo>>> websites with mflash to bother looking into it.
fsrfo>>> -pcf.
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 23
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:22:58 -0600
fsrfo>>> From: Eric Schuele <e.schuele at computer.org>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: I can not surf on Flash powered sites.
fsrfo>>> To: Brian Behlendorf <brian at hyperreal.org>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <42269122.7000505 at computer.org>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you using Xorg6.8.1 and have enabled the Composite extension ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (as in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Section "Extensions"
>>>>>>> Option "Composite" "Enable"
>>>>>>> EndSection
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then add this line to /usr/X11R6/bin/firefox, just beneath the #!
>>>>>>> /bin/sh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Didn't make a difference with native builds of www/firefox v 1.0.1 and
>>>>>> www/flashplugin-firefox 0.4.12.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you run firefox with -g and get a dump and backtrace
>>>>> out of it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because, as I said earlier this thread:
>>>>
>>>> I do try it every couple of weeks to see if it works, but the best it
>>>> gets is two-three web sites and then the seg fault. I realize until I
>>>> sit down with a stack trace I haven't earned the right to complain, so I
>>>> haven't yet, figuring it'll be important enough someday to someone
>>>> clueful enough. Or, Macromedia will some day lighten up and let Mozilla
>>>> include it as part of the web browser by default. Or something.
>>>>
>>>> ...and that I've got nowhere near the chops to do anything useful with a
>>>> stack trace that I'm sure others do. I thought I'd pipe up in response
>>>> to Ruben's message to provide a data point. Am I the only one for whom
>>>> Firefox and www/flashplugin-firefox doesn't work?
>>>>
fsrfo>>> Fails for me too. On all flash sites near as I can tell.
fsrfo>>> -Eric
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>>
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Regards,
fsrfo>>> Eric
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 24
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:40:28 -0700
fsrfo>>> From: Didier Caamano <nemesisdivina at gennux.ca>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Dual booting with Windows XP
fsrfo>>> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <stable at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4226953C.7080107 at gennux.ca>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> Hello everyone:
fsrfo>>> This might sound rather foolish, but I need some assistance on how to
fsrfo>>> dual boot FBSD 5.3 with WinXP.
fsrfo>>> I have to Hard Drives, Windows is in the first drive, and I want to
fsrfo>>> install FBSD on the second. No in the installation process I choose to
fsrfo>>> create the partitions to the second Hard Drive, then it ask me if I want
fsrfo>>> to install the boot manager, to which I answer yes, then it ask me where
fsrfo>>> to install it, and I choose to the First Hard drive, is that ok? well,
fsrfo>>> what happens is that after I choose the installer send me to disklabel
fsrfo>>> to slice the Hard drive, but it show the First hard drive.
fsrfo>>> am I making any sense at all? I thought that
fsrfo>>> installing the boot manager
fsrfo>>> was going to be a straigh forward process, is there anything wrong with
fsrfo>>> what I am experiencing? Any help will be appreciated.
fsrfo>>> Good night everyone
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 25
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500
fsrfo>>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown at gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022048b90c457 at mail.gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with
fsrfo>>> the following in make.conf
fsrfo>>> CPUTYPE=i686
fsrfo>>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe
fsrfo>>> It was built on a p4.
fsrfo>>> I went to install this on my trusty firewall
fsrfo>>> machine and I get the following
fsrfo>>> error:
fsrfo>>> -----BEGIN ERROR-----
fsrfo>>> CD Loader 1.2
fsrfo>>> Building the boot loader arguments
fsrfo>>> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found
fsrfo>>> Relocating the loader and the BTX
fsrfo>>> Starting the BTX loader
fsrfo>>> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01
fsrfo>>> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528
fsrfo>>> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0
fsrfo>>> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4
fsrfo>>> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033
fsrfo>>> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00
fsrfo>>> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00
fsrfo>>> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
fsrfo>>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
fsrfo>>> BTX halted
fsrfo>>> -----END ERROR-----
fsrfo>>> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well.
fsrfo>>> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot
fsrfo>>> and boot from that.
fsrfo>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next.
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 26
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:56:57 -0800
fsrfo>>> From: Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Crash when PREEMPTION enabled
fsrfo>>> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy at optushome.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050303045657.GA6139 at xor.obsecurity.org>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
fsrfo>>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:13:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>>> I have tried enabling PREEMPTION on 5.3-RELEASE-p5 whilst it ran OK
>>>> for a few hours, it crashed overnight whilst doing a "make index" in
>>>> /usr/ports. I've tried repeating "make index" and it worked. I have
>>>> a coredump of the crash and have been doing some poking around.
fsrfo>>> I've just turned on PREEMPTION on the 12-CPU sparc64 machine running
fsrfo>>> RELENG_5 that I've been playing with, and it quickly resets and
fsrfo>>> reboots under load (buildworld -j12). This happens with either ULE or
fsrfo>>> 4BSD, although ULE without PREEMPTION seems to work fine (and perform
fsrfo>>> much better than 4BSD, as expected).
fsrfo>>> It looks like PREEMPTION is indeed still broken in RELENG_5 - I guess
fsrfo>>> my workloads aren't enough to trigger this on other machines :-(
fsrfo>>> Kris
fsrfo>>> -------------- next part --------------
fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
fsrfo>>> Name: not available
fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes
fsrfo>>> Desc: not available
fsrfo>>> Url :
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050302/d783fa82/attachment-0001.bin
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 27
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800
fsrfo>>> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83 at verizon.net>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503022100.28784.reso3w83 at verizon.net>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
fsrfo>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote:
>>>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in
>>>> make.conf
>>>>
>>>> CPUTYPE=i686
>>>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe
>>>>
>>>> It was built on a p4.
fsrfo>>> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O
fsrfo>>> -Mike
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 28
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:09:11 -0500
fsrfo>>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown at gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83 at verizon.net>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022109d8561e2 at mail.gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's
fsrfo>>> correct in the make.conf.
fsrfo>>> Best,
fsrfo>>> Edwin
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:00:22 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
fsrfo>>> <reso3w83 at verizon.net> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 08:48 pm, Edwin Brown wrote:
>>>> > I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in
>>>> > make.conf
>>>> >
>>>> > CPUTYPE=i686
>>>> > CFLAGS=-02 -pipe
>>>> >
>>>> > It was built on a p4.
>>>>
>>>> CFLAGS should be -O2 not -02 and you really may want to concider just -O
>>>>
>>>> -Mike
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>>
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 29
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:15:28 -0500
fsrfo>>> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists at northglobe.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: ndis problem with stable kernel source
fsrfo>>> To: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <42269D70.5090806 at northglobe.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm
fsrfo>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on
fsrfo>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried
fsrfo>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my
fsrfo>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this
fsrfo>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make):
fsrfo>>> linking kernel
fsrfo>>> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard':
fsrfo>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data'
fsrfo>>> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci':
fsrfo>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data'
fsrfo>>> *** Error code 1
fsrfo>>> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09.
fsrfo>>> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC
fsrfo>>> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts?
fsrfo>>> Regards,
fsrfo>>> Nicholas
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 30
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:15:03 -0500
fsrfo>>> From: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown at gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <8b6eae960503022115363d3fde at mail.gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> It boots OK from the floppies as a work around...
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:48:19 -0500, Edwin Brown
fsrfo>>> <edwin.brown at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I've built 5.3 Stable as of tonight 03/02/2005 with the following in make.conf
>>>>
>>>> CPUTYPE=i686
>>>> CFLAGS=-02 -pipe
>>>>
>>>> It was built on a p4.
>>>>
>>>> I went to install this on my trusty firewall machine and I get the following
>>>> error:
>>>> -----BEGIN ERROR-----
>>>> CD Loader 1.2
>>>>
>>>> Building the boot loader arguments
>>>> Looking up /BOOT/LOADER... Found
>>>> Relocating the loader and the BTX
>>>> Starting the BTX loader
>>>>
>>>> BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01
>>>>
>>>> int=0000000d err=000000c0 efl=00010a47 eip=00015528
>>>> eax=00000000 ebx=00000001 ecx=ffffffff edx=00094fa0
>>>> esi=01164e7f edi=c8b66ff7 ebp=00093ff8 esp=7c24ddf4
>>>> cs=002b ds=0033 es=0033 fs=0033 gs=0033 ss=0033
>>>> cs:eip=9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00
>>>> 9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00-9a c0 00 00 9a c0 00 00
>>>> ss:esp=ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>>> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>>>> BTX halted
>>>> -----END ERROR-----
>>>> Also, the 5.3.isos downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org fail to boot as well.
>>>>
>>>> It's not hardware related as I'm able to pop in a OpenBSD3.6 snapshot
>>>> and boot from that.
>>>>
>>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm going to try the floppies next.
>>>>
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 31
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:25:30 -0800
fsrfo>>> From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83 at verizon.net>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: 5.3 STABLE Boot CD Fails on PPRO 200 (BTX halted)
fsrfo>>> To: Edwin Brown <edwin.brown at gmail.com>,
fsrfo>>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503022125.31189.reso3w83 at verizon.net>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
fsrfo>>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 09:09 pm, Edwin Brown wrote:
>>>> I didn't cut and paste that. I had to copy everything by hand. It's
>>>> correct in the make.conf.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Edwin
>>>>
fsrfo>>> OK, did you try just using -O? There is a note about that in the
fsrfo>>> make.conf file.
fsrfo>>> -Mike
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 32
fsrfo>>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:50:41 -0800
fsrfo>>> From: pete wright <nomadlogic at gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>>> FreebBSD 4.10
fsrfo>>> To: Artem Kuchin <matrix at itlegion.ru>
fsrfo>>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <57d7100005030221505d8ff1b2 at mail.gmail.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin
fsrfo>>> <matrix at itlegion.ru> wrote:
>>>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2)
>>>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ?
>>>>
>>>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE
>>>> driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure).
fsrfo>>> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have
fsrfo>>> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well,
fsrfo>>> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If
fsrfo>>> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in
fsrfo>>> software via VINUM?
fsrfo>>> -p
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> ~~o0OO0o~~
fsrfo>>> Pete Wright
fsrfo>>> www.nycbug.org
fsrfo>>> NYC's *BSD User Group
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 33
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030
fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Cc: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote:
>>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm
>>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on
>>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried
>>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my
>>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this
>>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make):
fsrfo>>> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from?
fsrfo>>> etc..
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there
fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from."
fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum
fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
fsrfo>>> -------------- next part --------------
fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
fsrfo>>> Name: not available
fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes
fsrfo>>> Desc: not available
fsrfo>>> Url :
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0002.bin
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 34
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:42:33 +1030
fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Cc: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031642.39981.doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote:
>>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm
>>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on
>>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried
>>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my
>>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this
>>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make):
fsrfo>>> How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from?
fsrfo>>> etc..
fsrfo>>> --
fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
fsrfo>>> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
fsrfo>>> "The nice thing about standards is that there
fsrfo>>> are so many of them to choose from."
fsrfo>>> -- Andrew Tanenbaum
fsrfo>>> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
fsrfo>>> -------------- next part --------------
fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
fsrfo>>> Name: not available
fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes
fsrfo>>> Desc: not available
fsrfo>>> Url :
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/b6b2f887/attachment-0003.bin
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 35
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:20:58 -0500
fsrfo>>> From: Nicholas Basila <mlists at northglobe.com>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source
fsrfo>>> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <4226ACCA.1020503 at northglobe.com>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
fsrfo>>> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:45, Nicholas Basila wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm
>>>>>using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on
>>>>>5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried
>>>>>rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my
>>>>>original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this
>>>>>failure is after the make depend... during the make):
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>How did you run ndiscvt? Where did you get the driver from?
>>>>etc..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
fsrfo>>> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so:
fsrfo>>> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o
fsrfo>>> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h
fsrfo>>> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs
fsrfo>>> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have
fsrfo>>> these options at the bottom of my kernel config:
fsrfo>>> options NDISAPI
fsrfo>>> device ndis
fsrfo>>> device wlan
fsrfo>>> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the
fsrfo>>> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that
fsrfo>>> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got
fsrfo>>> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight.
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 36
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:30:44 +0100 (CET)
fsrfo>>> From: pcasidy at casidy.com
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source
fsrfo>>> To: mlists at northglobe.com
fsrfo>>> Cc: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <20050303062137.3DFFFB86C at smtp.casidy.net>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
fsrfo>>> On 3 Mar, Nicholas Basila wrote:
>>>> I've been getting an error building 5-stable on an i386 P4 notebook. I'm
>>>> using an ndis_driver_data.h file that I successfully used on
>>>> 5.3-RELEASE, and even 5-CURRENT before the 5.3 release. I tried
>>>> rebuilding the file with ndiscvt. The file came out the same as my
>>>> original, but I still had the build error. Here's the error (this
>>>> failure is after the make depend... during the make):
>>>>
>>>> linking kernel
>>>> if_ndis_pccard.o(.text+0xc): In function `ndis_probe_pccard':
>>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data'
>>>> if_ndis_pci.o(.text+0x14): In function `ndis_probe_pci':
>>>> : undefined reference to `drv_data'
>>>> *** Error code 1
>>>>
>>>> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/HP09.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This card worked fine with 5.3-RELEASE. It's a Broadcom 54G wireless NIC
>>>> on an HP zd7140us notebook. Any thoughts?
fsrfo>>> I had exactly this problem when my
fsrfo>>> ndis_driver_data.h was built with a
fsrfo>>> previous version of ndiscvt. You may have to update your world too.
fsrfo>>> Hope that helps!
fsrfo>>> Phil.
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 37
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:32:36 +0100
fsrfo>>> From: Emanuel Strobl <emanuel.strobl at gmx.net>
fsrfo>>> Subject: -PRErelease and ACPI: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA
fsrfo>>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503030732.41525 at harrymail>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
fsrfo>>> Dear Hackers,
fsrfo>>> on one remote machine I see the following error
fsrfo>>> (RELENG_5 from this night):
fsrfo>>> pcib0: no PRT entry for 0.1.INTA
fsrfo>>> I have only ssh access and putting "-v" in
fsrfo>>> /boot.config didn't help me getting
fsrfo>>> a verbose dmesg.
fsrfo>>> Anyway, I think it's caused by a bogus BIOS but I
fsrfo>>> wanted to make sure having
fsrfo>>> it reported.
fsrfo>>> Last version was RELENG_5 from Nov. 5th and I also had a ACPI error but more
fsrfo>>> detailed. Unfortunately I lost the output....
fsrfo>>> Thanks,
fsrfo>>> -Harry
fsrfo>>> -------------- next part --------------
fsrfo>>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
fsrfo>>> Name: not available
fsrfo>>> Type: application/pgp-signature
fsrfo>>> Size: 187 bytes
fsrfo>>> Desc: not available
fsrfo>>> Url :
fsrfo>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050303/4105ef46/attachment-0001.bin
fsrfo>>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>>> Message: 38
fsrfo>>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:27:46 +1030
fsrfo>>> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Subject: Re: ndis problem with stable kernel source
fsrfo>>> To: Nicholas Basila <mlists at northglobe.com>
fsrfo>>> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>>> Message-ID: <200503031727.52538.doconnor at gsoft.com.au>
fsrfo>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
fsrfo>>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:50, Nicholas Basila wrote:
>>>> Well, I've been using the official HP driver. I ran the utility like so:
fsrfo>>> I don't know where the official HP driver is (hint: a URL would be handy)
>>>> ndiscvt -i name_of_nt_driver.inf -s name_of_nt_driver.sys -o
>>>> /tmp/ndis_driver_data.h
>>>>
>>>> I then copied it to the compile directory of my kernel. Make depend runs
>>>> correctly, but it crashes out during the linking phase of make. I have
>>>> these options at the bottom of my kernel config:
>>>>
>>>> options NDISAPI
>>>> device ndis
>>>> device wlan
fsrfo>>> I would suggest building it as a module as it's
fsrfo>>> much simpler (unless you're
fsrfo>>> booting over this interface - which is doubtful)
fsrfo>>> eg..
fsrfo>>> cd /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis
fsrfo>>> cp /tmp/foo.inf /tmp/foo.sys .
fsrfo>>> ndiscvt -i foo.inf -s foo.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h
fsrfo>>> make
fsrfo>>> make install
>>>> As I said, this worked perfectly with 5.3 and even 5-current before the
>>>> 5.3 release. I tried building the stable version of ndiscvt, and that
>>>> didn't produce a different header file. I did a cvsup two days ago, got
>>>> the error, and did a new cvsup tonight.
fsrfo>>> Make sure your userland and kernel are in sync - ie install world to match
fsrfo>>> your new kernel. You may be building against stale headers.
fsrfo>> В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма.
fsrfo>> Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться,
fsrfo>> то в последнюю очередь.
fsrfo>> Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их
fsrfo>> тему.
fsrfo>> --
fsrfo>> С уважением,
fsrfo>> Пенерджи Р.В.
fsrfo>> Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг"
fsrfo>> mailto:prv at s-holding.ru
fsrfo>> mailto:prv0 at yandex.ru
fsrfo>> +7 095 933-8678
fsrfo>> +7 095 933-2811
fsrfo>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 2
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:13:18 +0300
fsrfo>> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix at itlegion.ru>
fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10
fsrfo>> To: "pete wright" <nomadlogic at gmail.com>
fsrfo>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>> Message-ID: <00b101c51fd1$3fd448f0$0c00a8c0 at artem>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
fsrfo>> reply-type=original
fsrfo>> pete wright <nomadlogic at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin <matrix at itlegion.ru>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2)
>>>> controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ?
>>>>
>>>> It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB
>>>> IDE driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for
>>>> sure).
>>>
>>> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have
>>> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well,
>>> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If
>>> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in
>>> software via VINUM?
fsrfo>> Well, i don't trust software raids. But 3ware is probably one of the most
fsrfo>> expensive raid 0,1 controllers. There must be something around 40$ which
fsrfo>> freebsd supports. Does anyone known any model?
fsrfo>> --
fsrfo>> Regards,
fsrfo>> Artem Kuchin
fsrfo>> IT Legion Ltd.
fsrfo>> Moscow, Russia
fsrfo>> www.itlegion.ru
fsrfo>> matrix at itlegion.ru
fsrfo>> +7 095 232-0338
fsrfo>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 3
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:10:00 +0000
fsrfo>> From: Gerald de la Pascua <geralddelapascua at gmail.com>
fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10
fsrfo>> To: pete wright <nomadlogic at gmail.com>
fsrfo>> Cc: Artem Kuchin <matrix at itlegion.ru>
fsrfo>> Message-ID: <1bcf5ef9050303011052f49965 at mail.gmail.com>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>> we have had very good experiences with the basic 3ware cards,
fsrfo>> I would recommend them, easy to install, reliable, and good perfomance,
fsrfo>> in the uk they cost just over 100 pounds, so a similar price to two
fsrfo>> disks to plug into them. When a disk fails you would willingly pay
fsrfo>> many times this amount,
fsrfo>> kind regards, Gerald
fsrfo>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:50:41 -0800, pete wright
fsrfo>> <nomadlogic at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin <matrix at itlegion.ru> wrote:
>>> > Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2)
>>> > controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ?
>>> >
>>> > It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE
>>> > driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure).
>>>
>>> sorry I don't know of any really cheap one's off hand, altho I do have
>>> experience with 3Ware RAID cards on 4.x. They seemed to work well,
>>> and they are less expensive than proper SCSI cards...altho slower. If
>>> cost really an issue would it be worth mirroring your disks in
>>> software via VINUM?
>>>
>>> -p
>>>
>>> --
>>> ~~o0OO0o~~
>>> Pete Wright
>>> www.nycbug.org
>>> NYC's *BSD User Group
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>
fsrfo>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 4
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:23:56 +0300
fsrfo>> From: "Artem Kuchin" <matrix at itlegion.ru>
fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Need really cheap IDE mirroring PCI controlled for
fsrfo>> FreebBSD 4.10
fsrfo>> To: <gerald at homes-on-line.com>, "pete wright" <nomadlogic at gmail.com>
fsrfo>> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>> Message-ID: <00d401c51fd2$bd034af0$0c00a8c0 at artem>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
fsrfo>> reply-type=original
fsrfo>> Gerald de la Pascua <geralddelapascua at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> we have had very good experiences with the basic 3ware cards,
>>> I would recommend them, easy to install, reliable, and good
>>> perfomance, in the uk they cost just over 100 pounds, so a similar
>>> price to two
>>> disks to plug into them. When a disk fails you would willingly pay
>>> many times this amount,
fsrfo>> 3ware controllers are one of the most expensive ones. I am sure there
fsrfo>> are good controllers which cost a lot less and work with freebsd. Do
fsrfo>> you know any?
fsrfo>> Artem
fsrfo>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 5
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:18:23 +0900 (JST)
fsrfo>> From: Yoshiaki Kasahara <kasahara at nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
fsrfo>> Subject: 1000baseTX?
fsrfo>> To: stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>> Message-ID:
fsrfo>> <20050303.181823.216808984.kasahara at nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
fsrfo>> Hello,
fsrfo>> In man pages, dmesg and ifconfig of FreeBSD5, GbE operation over
fsrfo>> twisted pair is mostly referred as '1000baseTX'. I guess most of them
fsrfo>> should be replaced by '1000baseT'. 1000base"TX" and 1000base"T" are
fsrfo>> different standard and they are not compatible ("TX" needs CAT6 cable
fsrfo>> and uses pairs in different way). Also 1000baseTX support is very
fsrfo>> rare yet. I'm sorry I'm not sure if some devices really support "TX".
fsrfo>> For example, I have a NIC based on Realtek RTL8169S and its manual
fsrfo>> says "It supports 1000BASE-T/100BASE-TX/10BASE-T".
fsrfo>> In dmesg:
fsrfo>> rgephy0: <RTL8169S/8110S media interface> on miibus1
fsrfo>> rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX,
fsrfo>> 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto
fsrfo>> Regards,
fsrfo>> --
fsrfo>> Yoshiaki Kasahara
fsrfo>> kasahara at nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
fsrfo>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 6
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:04:30 +0000
fsrfo>> From: Jake Stride <nsuk at users.sourceforge.net>
fsrfo>> Subject: Linking with CUPS Issue
fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4226E12E.7000209 at users.sourceforge.net>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
fsrfo>> I have had a look on google and the archives and although I have seen
fsrfo>> people with a similar issue I have not been able to find an answer to
fsrfo>> the issue I have.
fsrfo>> I am trying to compile the magicolor 2430DL printer dirvers and keep
fsrfo>> running into the following error:
fsrfo>> root at lancelot# make
fsrfo>> Linking rastertokmlf...
fsrfo>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcups
fsrfo>> *** Error code 1
fsrfo>> Stop in /root/magicolor2430DL-1.1.0.
fsrfo>> Now I have the following cups packages installed (I am using 5.3), what
fsrfo>> am I doing wrong?
fsrfo>> Thanks
fsrfo>> Jake
fsrfo>> root at lancelot# pkg_info | grep cups
fsrfo>> cups-1.1.23.0 The Common UNIX Printing System: Metaport to install
fsrfo>> comple
fsrfo>> cups-base-1.1.23.0_3 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, &
fsrfo>> daemons
fsrfo>> cups-lpr-1.1.23.0 The CUPS BSD and system V compatibility binaries
fsrfo>> (lp* comma
fsrfo>> cups-pstoraster-7.07_3 GNU Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to
fsrfo>> non-PS prin
fsrfo>> gnome-cups-manager-0.28,1 Admistration tool for cups
fsrfo>> libgnomecups-0.1.14,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration
fsrfo>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 7
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:09:55 +0100
fsrfo>> From: Jared Earle <jearle at gmail.com>
fsrfo>> Subject: Re: Dual booting with Windows XP
fsrfo>> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <stable at freebsd.org>
fsrfo>> Message-ID: <5bbc0cd6050303020977bbf94e at mail.gmail.com>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
fsrfo>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:40:28 -0700, Didier Caamano
fsrfo>> <nemesisdivina at gennux.ca> wrote:
>>> Hello everyone:
>>>
>>> This might sound rather foolish, but I need some assistance on how to
>>> dual boot FBSD 5.3 with WinXP.
>>>
>>> I have to Hard Drives, Windows is in the first drive, and I want to
>>> install FBSD on the second. No in the installation process I choose to
>>> create the partitions to the second Hard Drive, then it ask me if I want
>>> to install the boot manager, to which I answer yes, then it ask me where
>>> to install it, and I choose to the First Hard drive, is that ok? well,
>>> what happens is that after I choose the installer send me to disklabel
>>> to slice the Hard drive, but it show the First hard drive.
>>>
>>> am I making any sense at all? I thought that installing the boot manager
>>> was going to be a straigh forward process, is there anything wrong with
>>> what I am experiencing? Any help will be appreciated.
fsrfo>> If you want Windows on the first drive, then I recommend letting the
fsrfo>> Windows boot manager handle it.
fsrfo>> The handbook page on it is here, but it seems to be missing the fact
fsrfo>> that you can find the boot file (/boot/boot1) on the install CD.
fsrfo>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NT-BOOTLOADER
fsrfo>> Here's my tiny howto for fedora with a freebsd addendum:
fsrfo>> http://www.ramblingwaffles.net/DualBoot
fsrfo>> --
fsrfo>> Jared Earle :: http://www.23x.net
fsrfo>> jearle at gmail.com :: There is no SPORK
fsrfo>> ------------------------------
fsrfo>> Message: 8
fsrfo>> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:18:13 -0600
fsrfo>> From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra at tundraware.com>
fsrfo>> Subject: Need Help With mount_smbfs Error Message
fsrfo>> To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo>> Message-ID: <4226E465.5050709 at tundraware.com>
fsrfo>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
fsrfo>> I am running 4.11-stable (sources up-to-date as of today). I have
fsrfo>> a smb file system mounted on this machine (it is a samba share on another
fsrfo>> 4.11-stable box). I am seeing this message intermittently:
fsrfo>> smb_maperror:Unmapped error 1:158
fsrfo>> What might be causing this?
fsrfo>> TIA,
fsrfo> В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма.
fsrfo> Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться,
fsrfo> то в последнюю очередь.
fsrfo> Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их
fsrfo> тему.
fsrfo> --
fsrfo> С уважением,
fsrfo> Пенерджи Р.В.
fsrfo> Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг"
fsrfo> mailto:prv at s-holding.ru
fsrfo> mailto:prv0 at yandex.ru
fsrfo> +7 095 933-8678
fsrfo> +7 095 933-2811
fsrfo> ------------------------------
fsrfo> Message: 2
fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:29:04 +0100
fsrfo> From: Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari at supsi.ch>
fsrfo> Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: can't get a crash dump
fsrfo> To: Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org>
fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226F500.6070406 at supsi.ch>
fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
fsrfo> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:52:00PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
>>
>>
>>>hehe.. talked to early.. just had another crash.. and as usual
>>>it didn't dump, and it didn't enter ddb.. it just reset!
>>
>>
>> OK, now that we've established that it's not actually panicking, the
>> overwhelmingly most likely cause of 'spontaneous reset' crashes is bad
>> hardware. e.g. your power supply may be marginal and unable to hold
>> up to peak loads, so your system will lose power and reboot when you
>> exceed that load.
>>
>> Kris
fsrfo> Ok. The problem seams to be solved.. it was a hardware problem.
fsrfo> Thank you!
fsrfo> Best regards.
fsrfo> --
fsrfo> Roberto Nunnari -software engineer-
fsrfo> mailto:roberto.nunnari at supsi.ch
fsrfo> Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana
fsrfo> Dipartimento Tecnologie Innovative
fsrfo> http://www.dti.supsi.ch
fsrfo> SUPSI-DTI
fsrfo> Via Cantonale tel: +41-91-6108561
fsrfo> 6928 Manno """ fax: +41-91-6108570
fsrfo> Switzerland (o o)
fsrfo> =======================oOO==(_)==OOo========================
fsrfo> ------------------------------
fsrfo> Message: 3
fsrfo> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:57:53 +0000
fsrfo> From: Jake Stride <jake.stride at senokian.com>
fsrfo> Subject: Re: Linking with CUPS Issue
fsrfo> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01 at gmail.com>
fsrfo> Cc: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
fsrfo> Message-ID: <4226FBC1.9030105 at senokian.com>
fsrfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
fsrfo> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>>try ls -l /usr/local/lib/libcups*
>>to see if the libraries are in place
>>if not install:
>>/usr/ports/print/cups-base
>>if they are try:
>>ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib/
>>
>>-Mike
>>_______________________________________________
>>freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>>
fsrfo> Still no luck:
fsrfo> ls -l /usr/local/lib/libcups*
fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 159842 Jan 28 16:04 /usr/local/lib/libcups.a
fsrfo> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Jan 28 16:04 /usr/local/lib/libcups.so
->> libcups.so.2
fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 124828 Jan 28 16:04 /usr/local/lib/libcups.so.2
fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 102092 Jan 28 16:04
fsrfo> /usr/local/lib/libcupsimage.a
fsrfo> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Jan 28 16:04
fsrfo> /usr/local/lib/libcupsimage.so -> libcupsimage.so.2
fsrfo> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 79770 Jan 28 16:04
fsrfo> /usr/local/lib/libcupsimage.so.2
fsrfo> root at lancelot# ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib
fsrfo> root at lancelot# make
fsrfo> Linking rastertokmlf...
fsrfo> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcups
fsrfo> *** Error code 1
fsrfo> Stop in /root/magicolor2430DL-1.1.0.
fsrfo> Thanks
fsrfo> Jake
В данном сообщении отсутствует тема письма.
Информирую Вас, что подобные сообщения если и будут рассматриваться,
то в последнюю очередь.
Прошу Вас впредь, для ускорения обработки Ваших сообщений указывать их
тему.
--
С уважением,
Пенерджи Р.В.
Начальник отдела ИТ ЗАО Корпорация "СХолдинг"
mailto:prv at s-holding.ru
mailto:prv0 at yandex.ru
+7 095 933-8678
+7 095 933-2811
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list