Two Options: which to choose?

[Dominic Marks]

On Thursday 30 June 2005 22:53, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> > After changing to PF I did not notice single crash for month
> > (production servers with, sometimes, heavy load).
> >
> > I would try FreeBSD with PF anyway. Works perfectly.
>
> You say it didn't crash for a month, but then you say to try FreeBSD
> with PF because it works perfectly.  To me, a month of uptime isn't
> perfectly. Can you elaborate?  Is your machine still crashing even
> though its taking a month instead of a few days like it did
> previously?

Could you not use pfsync to mitigate the problem (at least
partially)? As for your original question, I think its less
work to change your hardware to something you know works than
changing operating systems. Why not use single CPU machines
for this?

> Thanks,
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"

-- 
Dominic
GoodforBusiness.co.uk
I.T. Services for SMEs in the UK.