New Server - To 5.x or Not To 5.x
kirk at strauser.com
Tue Jun 14 19:59:36 GMT 2005
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:05, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Is there anyone out there using 5-STABLE and UNIONFS that are happy with
> it, or is it still very problematic?
This probably isn't the heavy-duty example you wanted, but...
I run 5.4-STABLE on a laptop, and mount /usr/ports/distfiles read-only from
another server via smbfs. Then, I use unionfs to
mount /usr/ports/localdistfiles above /usr/ports/distfiles. This is hardly
in the same league as running a database or mailserver through unionfs, but
it certainly seems stable enough for my limited needs.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050614/917476fb/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-stable