New Server - To 5.x or Not To 5.x

[Kirk Strauser]

On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:05, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> Is there anyone out there using 5-STABLE and UNIONFS that are happy with
> it, or is it still very problematic?

This probably isn't the heavy-duty example you wanted, but...

I run 5.4-STABLE on a laptop, and mount /usr/ports/distfiles read-only from 
another server via smbfs.  Then, I use unionfs to 
mount /usr/ports/localdistfiles above /usr/ports/distfiles.  This is hardly 
in the same league as running a database or mailserver through unionfs, but 
it certainly seems stable enough for my limited needs.
-- 
Kirk Strauser
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050614/917476fb/attachment.bin