stack backtrace

[Derek Kuliński]

Hello Kris,

Thursday, June 2, 2005, 12:37:41 AM, you wrote:

> It looks like debugging code (it's been removed in -current).

> Jeff:

> in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp->b_vp
> == NULL..you removed it in current in 1.166, but some people are
> seeing it trigger on 5.x

So it's harmless?

As for debugging, I compiled kernel with:
makeoptions     DEBUG=-g
options         KDB
options         KDB_TRACE
options         DDB

To have coredump, if system crashes (I didn't oticed any slowdown, so
I guess it doesn't hurt)

Are those last three options necessary to get core? Or is only
DEBUG=-g needed?

-- 
Best regards,
 Derek                            mailto:takeda at takeda.tk
CCNA, SCSA, SCNA, LPIC, MCP certified
http://www.takeda.tk

Trying to outsmart a compiler defeats much of the purpose of using one.
-- Kernighan & Plauger, "The Elements of Programming Style"