Save the Demon!

[PhysicalChemist at aol.com]

Oh I would not suggest removing Beastie altogether Jesper! That one is too 
well known, but to add a supplementary angel with the feminine would add to the 
Package.  I am not talking St. Michael here, but rather Lillith, or Mary, or 
one of Lot's daughters, or even Dinah (who was raped), or the Harlot by the 
side of the road...no, not the harlot, because it would better be the absolute 
opposite of Beastie...but not too soft, not Bianca, but the shrew.  Probably a 
Mary would make a good bet.
Bill Isakson

In a message dated 2/13/05 6:38:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
jesper at hackunite.net writes:


> Heya..
> 
> It might will be easily accepted, but yet, it's still a too advanced logo
> to place to resize and such.. Yet, I prefer the old logo and when I see
> it, it will always make me (and a LOT of others) to think of FreeBSD.. so
> change it as much as you want to, the current one will still be the
> primary one for me.. ;-) However, speaking of ideas/suggestions to the new
> logo.. Sure, it might be hard as well to resize, but how about  the
> current Beastie logo with some cuddly and small angel wings? :) But in the
> other hand, those religious retards who speaks before they gather enough
> information will probably accuse it for being a "fallen angel" instead..
> :-/ At the end, the current one wins my vote. :-)
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Jesper Wallin
> 
> > Hmm, I am not a good enough artist to submit the drawing, but perhaps a
> > good
> > supplement piece would be "Lover" with all the characteristics of the
> > traditional Angel. That way the logos would be compatible and easily
> > accepted as seen
> > togther on a website or box package or CD-disc, not too close together, of
> > course, but likely on opposite sides of the creation.  It could put a bit
> > of the
> > feminine into play as well.
> > Bill Isakson.
> > El Cerrito, CA
> >
> > In a message dated 2/13/05 10:23:21 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> > end at endif.cjb.net writes:
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:44:01 +0000 Dominic Marks <dom at helenmarks.co.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 08 February 2005 23:31, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> >> > > Can this be true?  Are they really looking to kill the FreeBSD
> >> > > demon? This borders on sacrilege.
> >> >
> >> > From http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/announce.txt
> >> >
> >> >  "This is the future site for the FreeBSD logo competiton which is
> >> >   meant to create a new logo for the FreeBSD Project to supplement
> >> >   the current Beastie mascot."
> >> >
> >> > Key word: supplement.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I was pretty hostile to the idea as many others were until I noticed
> >> that, yes, it is supplement.  I hope that this means if a new logo is
> >> chosen, Beastie will still have a place on the freebsd.org main page as
> >> mascot along with the new logo.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Robin Schoonover            <end at endif.cjb.net> <endx7 at users.sf.net>
> >>                                    <robin.schoonover at gmail.com>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> >
> 
>