ULE status

[Mipam]

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:38, Mipam wrote:
> 
> > Okay, so then the ULE sched is fairly stable then?
> > But it's still not the default scheduler?
> 
> It will never become the default scheduler in 5.x again. 5.x went into -STABLE 
> mode with 4BSD, and that's why the default will remain 4BSD.
> 
> > Is it safe to use right now 
> > under RELENG_5 or not? 
> 
> As already said, you need to try *yourself*.

Okay clear, but the fact that it's in 5-stable suggests the it's stable to 
use, else why would it be in 5-stable.
Maybe i'm completly wrong in this interpretation?
Bye,

Mipam.