mipam at ibb.net
Tue Feb 8 05:02:30 PST 2005
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:38, Mipam wrote:
> > Okay, so then the ULE sched is fairly stable then?
> > But it's still not the default scheduler?
> It will never become the default scheduler in 5.x again. 5.x went into -STABLE
> mode with 4BSD, and that's why the default will remain 4BSD.
> > Is it safe to use right now
> > under RELENG_5 or not?
> As already said, you need to try *yourself*.
Okay clear, but the fact that it's in 5-stable suggests the it's stable to
use, else why would it be in 5-stable.
Maybe i'm completly wrong in this interpretation?
More information about the freebsd-stable