RELENG_6: Which scheduler for SMP?

[Kris Kennaway]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:45:34AM -0500, Ian Lord wrote:

> Then what's the point of ULE if it's slower then 4BSD ? Is it more 
> stable, more... ? I compiled my kernel with ULE since I though it 
> would be better but you are starting to make me regret my decision :) 
> (I didn't benchmark both options, still in developpement right now, 
> nothing in production)

Partly research purposes, and it was originally hoped that it would be
faster (and it probably was for a while).  It needs more work, which
is what is meant by "still experimental".

Kris

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20051230/80a82013/attachment.bin