Upgrading 5.3 > 6.0 buildworld failure now in libmagic
bsdlists at rfnj.org
Tue Dec 6 16:50:20 PST 2005
On Tue, December 6, 2005 19:44, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, secmgr wrote:
>> Not to belabour this, but the 6.0 release notes do specificly say 5.3
>> and newer.
> 5.4-STABLE is newer. :)
>> "Source upgrades to FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE are only supported from FreeBSD
>> 5.3-RELEASE or later. Users of older systems wanting to upgrade
>> will need to update to FreeBSD 5.3 or newer first, then to FreeBSD
> How does this change to UPDATING in RELENG_6 look to you:
> Index: UPDATING
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/UPDATING,v
> retrieving revision 1.416.2.7
> diff -u -r1.416.2.7 UPDATING
> --- UPDATING 1 Nov 2005 23:44:40 -0000 1.416.2.7
> +++ UPDATING 7 Dec 2005 00:42:04 -0000
> @@ -229,7 +229,13 @@
> page for more details.
> Due to several updates to the build infrastructure, source
> - upgrades from versions prior to 5.3 no longer supported.
> + upgrades from versions prior to 5.4-STABLE are not likely
> + to succeed.
Sorry to butt in but..
Doesn't the definition of -STABLE change, for all intents and purposes, by
What next, "versions prior to 5.4-STABLE as of YYYYMMDD ...."?
> + When upgrading from one major version to another, it is
> + generally best to upgrade to the latest code in the branch
> + currently installed first, then do another upgrade to the
> + new branch.
This is getting closer to the truth.
Why don't you just say "update to the most recent RELENG_5 before
attempting." Future proof, no room for confusion.
More information about the freebsd-stable